Fig 9 (My PTOE, inscribed onto a 2_32 Coxeter plane, E7polytope)

In the above figure, the 128 chemical elements are formed into 7 concentric circles with a period of 18 chemical elements (with 2 polar elements). Each circular period has chemical elements, color-coded in a group of 7 with similarities that easily flow into one another, from the zero-point center to the outer circle. The red circled noble gases serve as the “spine” of total angular momentum corresponding to the degrees of 180°, 360°, 540°, 720°, 900°, 1080°, and 1260°. (See figure 6.  The fibration, zero points are at 720° and 1080°) There have been many circular and spiral periodic tables over the past 150 years and I am happy to add one more but to my knowledge, this is the first to show a direct connection to the Unified Field.  The E(7) polytope has also been linked directly to human consciousness thru human neuron microtubules https://philpapers.org/rec/SIRAMS   A lot of work has been done recently on the energy fields of the human body and the above information may help to advance that work.

Here is the Coxeter group of my E7 polytope with the Dynkin diagram, reflections, Coxeter number, and Degrees of fundamental invariants.  This diagram shows the importance of the 18-period elements of my Zero Point Periodic Table.  Notice that the number of reflections x 2 for each of the Coxeter groups starting with E6, represents the number of vertices of their respective polytope. For instance 72 vertices for E6, 126 for E7, and 240 for E8.  If you have ever viewed the beautiful patterns of a kaleidoscope,  chances are you have seen the replicas of these same figures.

Chapter 6

PROOF OF CONCEPT, FANO PLANE, CLIFFORD ALGEBRA, OCTONIONS, QUATERNIONS

The proof of my PTOE derives from the exceptional real E(8) Lie algebra of the Lisi TOE and from Cl(8) exceptional real Clifford algebras of where there are 256 vertices that can be split into two groups of 128 vertices i.e. the E(7)(7) SU(8) and exceptional Lie sub-algebras E(6) and F(4). As with the Lisi E(8) polytope, the 128 vertices of my modified polytope each contain the fundamental particles that build a quantum mechanics, fermionic structure representing real matter itself and the elements of my periodic table. (it would be good for the reader to know here that many of the lie algebras fit into each other like Russian dolls)  e.g E4, E6, E7 all into E8.  After Garrett Lisi published his Theory of Everything, physicists began the assignment of quantum field particles to each of the 248 vertices matching them to most of the known elements. (see figure 10) Here is an excellent website with a complete explanation of their particle assignments and the periodic table counterparts.  J. Gregory Moxness, who sells his personal graphics of many of these beautiful images on his website. You will also see the Fano plane image which is part of the structure of his images. (Please go to: http://theoryofeverything.org/TOE/JGM/Integrated%20E8,%20Binary,%20Octonion-web.pdf   Moxness has placed the 4D Stowe-Janet-Scerri Periodic Table on the Chemogenisis Web page at: https://www.metasynthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=589

These are his remarks from that web page about the Stowe-Scerri table……: “Interestingly, it has 120 elements, which is the number of vertices in the 600 Cell or the positive half of the 240 E8 roots. It is integrated into VisibLie_E8 so clicking on an element adds that particular atomic number’s E8 group vertex number to the 3rd E8 visualizer pane. The code is a revision and extension of Enrique Zeleny’s Wolfram Demonstration”  If you want a closer look at this just click on Enrique Zeleny’s link here.

Please note that there is an exact difference of 8 particles (vertices/elements) between the 248 of the Lisi polytope and the 256 particles of the exceptional Clifford algebras. I am using (figure 11) below, from the work of Frank (Tony) Smith, to illustrate this. These are the 8 missing chemical elements in the modern table and they now appear in my completed Periodic Table of Everything. I will show in principle, the existence of these 8 heavy, rare earth elements.

Figure 11

(credits,  from Frank (Tony) Smith’s web book)

Please notice his last sentence in Figure 11, “…..the 8 elements of 256-dim Cl(8) that do not directly correspond elements of 248-dim E(8).” Here again, we observe a deficit of 8 units. When he uses the term “elements” here it is referring to algebraic, geometric points (vertices) in the 8 dimension projections which I am using here as a Quantum Particle Element but extrapolating to their chemical element counterparts in my PTOE. (this has become a popular way to illustrate the periodic table as you will see below)

For close to 100 years there has been a little talked about division between physical chemistry and quantum physics mainly because the two methods do not fit together as naturally imagined. Take for instance the modern periodic table which has two rows of elements taken out of the middle and placed below the main body of the table (this happened in the 1930-the 40s). This certainly was not a natural flow to physicists who look to nature for physical explanations. (Newton’s apple tree did not have a big chunk taken from its very middle) Also, there is no consensus on many of the phenomena of quantum Chemistry and the critical explanations behind them. Here are just a few: The odd/even elemental abundances, the triad rule, the octaves, the Madelung rule, the Lanthanide and Actinide contractions, and there are many more anomalies. My new periodic table is a unifying table that gives answers to both physicists and chemists.

Look again at figure 7, Garrett Lisi’s E(8) TOE polytope. Here is a link to Lisi’s particle Explorer Program that allows you to build polytopes with any number of particle assignments: http://deferentialgeometry.org/epe/   When he first presented his new understanding of the GUT and quantum physics, most scientists were very receptive but there was one problem that even Lisi had to acknowledge. His theory had to allow for something called mirror fermions, however as of that year, 2007, mirror fermions had not yet been discovered in nature. If they did exist, the experts pointed out in 2009, they would be very massive particles. To overcome the above objections Lisi postulated that just because they have not been discovered, does not mean mirror fermions do not exist. Recent tests at the LHC, large hadron collider, have shown there are indeed, massive, mirror-like particles close to the atomic weight of Rhenium! Here again, we must acknowledge the phenomenal work of Ida Noddack.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhenium

Lisi continued his work on E(8) and in 2015 developed a new model called “Lie Group Cosmology” finding that the mirror fermion problem could be overcome by extending the E(8) to an infinite-dimensional Lie group like E8+++ E(11) which produces three generations of fermions with no mirror fermions. This may or may not be the ultimate GUT. I have chosen to use Lisi’s original model that allows for possible mirror fermions along with another model, the Cl(8) Lie algebra that shows mirror fermions can exist. The reason for this is simple: The 8 un-named elements are very massive, like the theorized mirror fermions as shown by their position among the other heavy, rare earth elements in the table. This is a good start in the right direction and another helpful coincidence.

The remaining paragraphs of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

“Maxwell’s equations were explicitly developed as fluid dynamical models, and require an underlying physical medium. Special relativity was derived from Maxwell’s equations. General relativity is based on perfect fluid equations. Thus, any theory based on one of these three theories implicitly retains all fluid dynamical properties. Any denial of an underlying physical medium by such a theorist is therefore hollow — and merely shows ignorance on the part of the practitioner concerning the history and derivation of the equations that are being used.”

“Fundamental challenges to disciplines tend to come from outside. It is customary for students to be introduced to their fields of study gradually, as slowly unfolding mysteries, so that by the time they can see their subject as a whole, they have been so thoroughly imbued with conventional preconceptions and patterns of thought that they are extremely unlikely to be able to question its basic premises.” Martin Bernal Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, Vol. I, 1987

Chapter 7

A NEW PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS EMERGES

The concept of un-named elements has been a constant feature of the periodic table since its very beginning but it was only after the Lanthanoids and Actinoids were placed unnaturally beneath the table that it took a bad detour. It was clear from the beginning that the table founder intended the table to be a whole, natural unit. (See figures 1,2,4& 5) In order for us to get back on the right path we first must uncover why the Rare Earth Elements were placed un-naturally below the table. At that time i.e. 20’s& 30’s scientists said the rare earth elements needed to be placed below because they all have similar properties. But there are many other elements, not rare earths, that have similar chemical properties and yet they were not treated the same way. So why did this happen and why did a professor of biochemistry place them in their correct position in 1960?   Dr. Isaac Asimov was that professor and we can see in his table (Figure 4) the same 8 empty spaces that appeared in the 1917 version of Dr. Mendeleev’s table. ( figure 2) When you look at the Asimov table the answer to this puzzle is immediately apparent. The Atomic numbers that rule all positions, end at #71 Lutetium and skip 4 blank, un-named elements and then continue at #72 Hafnium, 4 spaces ahead. This would and did present an untenable problem for the 1930’s scientists, some of whom were working on the Manhattan Project (Atomic Bomb). They had explained many of the facets of radioactivity but how could they now explain-away 8 missing elements, all their electrons, protons, neutrons, and their missing spaces in the middle of the table? Everything they knew about nuclear physics, the atom, the electrons, etc., etc. would have to be re-thought in order to account for these 8 massive, missing elements that did not appear on the face of the Earth. The concept of dark matter, dark energy, and the Higgs Boson could not have even been imagined. However, the lead scientists convinced others that the rare earths could and should be placed below the table, even though the period length of the rare earths are 14 elements long and not 18 like the main body. Here is the standards table of the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) https://www.nist.gov/blogs/taking-measure/periodic-table-its-more-just-chemistry-and-physics . A strategically placed numbering within the table shows that the 8 empty spaces were there all the time, as Dr. Asimov found. (Fig 12):

(Figure 12, credits as above, NIST)

Notice that I have marked and numbered 8 un-named/missing element spaces with the numbers 1-8 in red. (they are of course, not in the correct spaces,  think inside the box) The original periodic table has a limited, specific number of spaces and when 8 spaces are typed over or made to disappear, someone will take notice and in this case, it was the discerning eye of Dr. Isaac Asimov, author, and biochemist, who found the error (See Figure 4).

In the paper, “Nonlinear Magneto-Optics of Vacuum: SecondHarmonic Generation,” Ding and Kaplan (1989) proposed to generate second-harmonic “doubled” photons by focusing intense pulsed laser light on a region of the vacuum that had a strong magnetic field in it. According to classical electromagnetic theory, the electromagnetic field is completely linear, so there should be no interaction between the laser photons and the magnetic field. But if the fluctuations of the vacuum are taken into account, then the virtual positron-electron particle pairs created by the fluctuations result in a polarizable “plasma” in the region that can provide the nonlinear coupling mechanism needed to generate the second-harmonic photons. This experiment is important since it can distinguish between two existing physical models for the vacuum. In the standard quantum mechanical model, not only do atoms in matter undergo residual vibrational fluctuations even at zero absolute temperature, but the vacuum itself contains residual electromagnetic fluctuations. In the alternative “Fluctuating Charged Particle Source Field Theory” model, it is assumed that although atoms undergo residual vibrational fluctuations, there are no electromagnetic fluctuations of the vacuum and especially, there are no charged-particle positron-electron pairs being created in the vacuum. All the effects that occur in this model are produced by the vibrational fluctuations of the charged particle “sources” in the apparatus creating electromagnetic fields that pass through the vacuum to the other charged particles in the apparatus, causing them to vibrate in phase with the “source” particles. This “in-phase” sympathetic vibration produces forces which produce the experimental results. It might be possible to set up a very empty, very cold vacuum chamber, with a single charged particle in it, and monitor the velocity of the charged particle with time to see if it is accelerated. Haisch has suggested that instead of a proton, that an antiproton be used. This suggestion has many advantages over attempting to use any other particle. Since the theory gives a definitive prediction for a proton, the result should be the same for an antiproton. A single ^antiproton can been trapped, cooled to milli-kelvin temperatures, and its presence and initial position in the trap confirmed before the trap voltages are turned off. A sealed cryogenically cooled trap has essentially no residual air molecules in it. This has been proven by keeping 100,000 antiprotons in a trap for over a month without losing any since an annihilation of an antiproton by a nucleus would have produced easily detectable gamma rays or high energy pions. The traps can be made with a large working area along the axial direction. The antiproton can be “dropped” from essentially zero starting velocity and let fall a number of centimeters. Longer “drop” times can be obtained using a drop tower. When the antiproton finally strikes the wall of the trap, it will annihilate with the wall nuclei. The annihilation produces 2-6 gamma rays and 3-7 high energy pions, all of which are easily detected by a surrounding complex of radiation detectors. The pion tracks and the gamma ray events can be triangulated back to determine the annihilation point to a mm or so, so the exact time and place of the annihilation event can be determined. The experiment would then be repeated a number of times until a pattern of annihilation events is obtained. If the pattern is concentrated at the trap bottom, then only gravity accelerations are involved. If the pattern is concentrated at a few spots on the trap walls, then there are “work function patches” on the walls that are attracting the antiprotons to the patches by their electrical potential. If however, the pattern is random in space and very short in time, then this is good evidence that the vacuum electromagnetic fluctuations are the acceleration mechanism. One important aspect of this experiment, is that if the acceleration mechanism is found to operate, then this demonstrates at least one mechanism for the continuous extraction of limitless amounts of “free energy” from the vacuum.

I will use the below definition when reporting about the zero-point energy, field, wave and vacuum (ether).  This is the standard I used as I was building the form of my new Zero-Point Periodic Table.

The following is from Setterfield  2003

Properties Of The Vacuum: “The Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) derives its name from the fact that it is present even when there is no temperature radiation at zero degrees Kelvin. This energy exists as a universal “sea” of electromagnetic radiation, a bath in which every atom in the cosmos is immersed. The energy density of the ZPE that permeates every cubic centimetre of the universe was recently estimated by Davies as around 10110  Joules per cubic centimetre, a fairly typical figure. We are unaware of the presence of the ZPE for the same reason that we are unaware of atmospheric pressure on our bodies – its presence is balanced both inside and outside our bodies, and it permeates our instruments as well. Nevertheless experimental evidence confirms the presence of the ZPE in a number of ways. These include the Casimir effect, where two metal plates brought close together in a vacuum experience a measurable force pushing them together. The same effect at the atomic and molecular level is the origin of the feebly attractive Van der Waals forces. The ZPE is also the cause of random “noise” in electronic circuits that puts a limit on the levels to which signals can be amplified. This same vacuum energy also explains why cooling alone will never freeze liquid helium. Unless pressure is applied, the vacuum energy fluctuations prevent the atoms from getting close enough to trigger solidification.”

Thus when you see me refer to my Zero Point Periodic table, you will know that it is this concept that I am referring to within the structure, periodicity and harmonic  fluctuations.  What you will find below is that I believe the new structure of my P.T.O.E. is a mirror of both the Z.P.E. and the Z.P.F. wave itself.

Amazing as it is, I know that this is the shape, periodicity and fluctuation of the Zero Point Field wave itself.  I could reach no other conclusion.

The remaining paragraphs of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 139 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY Jan. 1986

Cluster decay, also named heavy particle radioactivity or heavy ion radioactivity, is a rare type of nuclear decay in which an atomic nucleus emits a small “cluster” of neutrons and protons, more than in an alpha particle, but less than a typical binary fission fragment. Ternary fission into three fragments also produces products in the cluster size. The loss of protons from the parent nucleus changes it to the nucleus of a different element, the daughter, with a mass number Ad = A − Ae and atomic number Zd = Z − Ze, where Ae = Ne + Ze.[1] For example:223
88Ra→ 14
6C+ 209Pb82
This type of rare decay mode was observed in radioisotopes that decay predominantly by alpha emission, and it occurs only in a small percentage of the decays for all such isotopes.[2] The main region of 20 emitters experimentally observed until 2010 is above Z=86: 221Fr, 221-224,226Ra, 223,225Ac, 228,230Th, 231Pa, 230,232-236U, 236,238Pu, and 242Cm. Only upper limits could be detected in the following cases: 12C decay of 114Ba, 15N decay of 223Ac, 18O decay of 226Th, 24,26Ne decays of 232Th and of 236U, 28Mg decays of 232,233,235U, 30Mg decay of 237Np, and 34Si decay of 240Pu and of 241Am.

Some of the cluster emitters are members of the three natural radioactive families. Others should be produced by nuclear reactions. Up to now no odd-odd emitter has been observed. As to the ultimate origin of the ZPE, two views are discussed in the physics literature: one, that it is simply part and parcel of the energetic legacy that emerged with the Big Bang, and another that it is an energetic substratum the preceded even the Big Bang, with our universe emerging as the result of a giant vacuum fluctuation. In any case an argument can be made that it is sustained by a cosmological feedback cycle in which charged particles radiate due to their “quantum jiggle,” and the particles “jiggle” due to being caught up in the collective radiation of all the other particles, an electromagnetic equivalent of placing a microphone near a speaker and generating a squeal (see H. E. Puthoff, “On the Source of Vacuum Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 40, p. 4857,1989; Phys. Rev. A vol. 44, p. 3382,1991).

“In Bearden’s view, the principal faults in reasoning lay in two places. First, the algebra used to express Maxwell’s original equations was changed, to ease understanding by others, from the highly complex quaternion type, which allowed and even prescribed overunity electromagnetic systems powered by space energy, to the much simpler tenser vector analysis, which did not. Second, Lorentz mathematically narrowed the scope and application of Maxwell’s equations to describe only that part of the energy flow that physical circuits were designed to catch and use. In overall effect, according to Bearden, the early theorists made mistakes in interpreting their own calculations and unwittingly modified their original equations to discard a significant portion of the energy that was extractable — and, in fact, is extracted — from the vacuum by actual physical systems. The central issue for him therefore became: How does one redesign these systems in a new way to be able to collect and make effective use of this excess energy from the river of space, which demonstrably exists and is so readily available in the ambient environment? And then: How does one keep the redesigned systems from destroying themselves by overtapping the infinite energy source of space?” ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 31 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY 

Bioteach asks: Could you please evaluate the “bubble theory” that Puthoff is investigating on the show. Does it sound promising to you? Hal Puthoff answers: The “Bubble Theory” presented on the Scientific American Frontiers program (that collapsing bubbles in cavitating fluids might act as a Casimir process to convert vacuum fluctuation energy into light) is not Puthoff’s theory, but rather was proposed by Nobel Laureate Julian Schwinger in a series of papers published in the early ’90’s in the Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences. As one of several theories put forth to explain the phenomenon of sonoluminescence (sonically-driven light phenomena), this particular theory, if true, might show an excess of heat energy in careful calorimetric measurements, and these measurements are being carried out at the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin. So far, no excess has been found, indicating that either Schwinger’s proposed mechanism is not correct, or that the percentage excess energy is vanishingly small in the experiments carried out to date.

Chapter 8

SUSSY, SUPERGRAVITY, FERMIONS, BOSONS, AND THE OCTAVE

To unwind the above error in the table we need to return to the problem of the massive mirror fermions introduced by the opponents of the physicist, Garrett Lisi and to understand mirror fermions, we must look at CPT symmetry transformation.

(CPT that is, CHARGE, PARITY, TIME) Here is a quote from an article in Wikipedia:

“The implication of CPT symmetry is that a “mirror-image” of our universe — with all objects having their positions reflected through an arbitrary point (corresponding to a parity inversion), all momenta reversed (corresponding to a time inversion) and with all matter replaced by antimatter (corresponding to a charge inversion) — would evolve under exactly our physical laws. The CPT transformation turns our universe into its “mirror image” and vice versa. CPT symmetry is recognized to be a fundamental property of physical laws.”

Some scientists believe these fermions violate CP, the combined symmetry of Charge and Parity. They wanted to eliminate the concept of mirror fermions as we can see in the following quote from George Triantaphyllou of the Institute of Theoretical Physics in Munich, Germany (Ida Noddack’s home country):

“Efforts to eliminate completely mirror fermions from nature are for some reminiscent of efforts several decades ago to identify the anti-electron with the proton, and amounts to not realizing that particles consistent with natural symmetries could actually exist independently. Such a gauge group and fermion extension, apart from fitting nicely into unification schemata, restores the left-right symmetry missing in the standard-model or in the simplest left-right symmetric models.” He goes on to say “Mirror particles are considered to be a possible component of the invisible dark matter.”

A lot of research has been taking place since the discovery of the Higgs Boson in 2011. Much of it is moving towards a Grand Unified Theory. One piece of the puzzle has been the work to prove or disprove the Supersymmetric Models, or abbreviated to SUSSY.  The following diagram is quite interesting:

(Figure 13, Supersymmetry in alternate numbers of dimensions, Credit to Wikipedia)

It is possible to have supersymmetry in dimensions other than four. Because the properties of spinors change drastically between different dimensions, each dimension has its characteristics. In d dimensions, the size of spinors is approximately 2^d/2 or 2^{(d − 1)/2}. Since the maximum number of supersymmetries is 32, the greatest number of dimensions in which a supersymmetric theory can exist is eleven. What caught my eye is the N=8 supergravity multiplet of (Figure 13). When the multiplet (superscript) of each even or odd part i.e. 2, 28, 70, 28 and 8, 56, 56, 8 ±1 is added it is 128, the same number of vertices in the E(7) polytope and the same number of elements of my PTOE. This is better explained by physicist Tony Smith in figure 15 below:

Figure 15 (I will be showing his 8-dimensional HyperCube calculation below)

Many people do not realize that they live with anti-matter on a daily basis. Anti-matter particles are around us all the time, in bananas, the air we breathe, and PET scans. Bananas have a positron (an anti-matter particle) in the form of a +Potassium ion. Every day lightning strikes the Earth 4 million times, 1.4 billion strikes a year, releasing around 3 trillion Kg of Ozone, and amid all that there are millions of positron antiparticles created. Here is an interesting site showing all the real-time lightning striking the earth, second by second: https://www.lightningmaps.org/#m=oss;t=3;s=1;o=0;b=;ts=0;z=4;y=29.1985;x=-89.1367;d=2;dl=8;dc=0;   The last PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scan you received was done using anti-matter.

Reading the many scientific articles about mirror fermions I was amazed how often

 the integer 8 was repeated. Beginning with Octonions, 8 vectors, 8 dimensions, 8 multiplets, 8 mirror fermions, 8 periodicity, 8 half-spinors, E(8), etc. This is not by accident but by design. The fundamental principle of the periodic table is the Octave scale familiar to us all in music. Here is an excellent example of what I am talking about. The following table, (Figure 16), is from one of the foremost collections of all things chemical: https://www.metasynthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=7

Also, see the excellent article by John Frederick Sweeney on the musical Octaves in Appendix 2 below.

(Credit, Meta-synthesis.com)

Dedication (Sweeney)

So let us dedicate ourselves to what the Greeks wrote so long ago: to tame the savageness of man and to make gentle the life of this world.

“Some men see things as they are and ask, why?

I see things that never have been, and ask, why not?”

Robert Francis Kennedy

            END OF SWEENEY PAPER        (Abridged)___________________________

Figure 16

This 1862 chemical chart and telluric graph show the elements arranged in Octaves and placed on a long cylinder to show the waves of “musical” elements.

Chapter 9

RARE EARTH MIRROR COMPOUNDS, HIGGS & BARYONIC MIRRORS, ROSENFELD PLANE, DARK MATTER THRU THE HIGGS PORTAL

Research is being conducted on the existence of Rare Earth mirror compounds which match my belief that the 8 un-named/missing elements are indeed among the rare earths. Here is an article entitled: Magnetic and noncentrosymmetric Weyl fermion semimetals in the RAlGe family of compounds (R=rare earth) From: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.041104 In the article the authors make the following statement:

“Taking advantage of the Weyl nodes generated by inversion-symmetry breaking in the nonmagnetic compound LaAlGe, we present a new type of magnetic Weyl semimetal in its iso-structural sister compounds CeAlGe and PrAlGe that are ferromagnetic.”

(credit, APS Physics/CHORUS)

What they have discovered in 2020 is that there are rare earth compounds (i.e. containing Lanthanum) that break inversion-symmetry, therefore, meeting the definition of an anomalous quantum field particle with mirror-like fundamentals. However, to be consistent, we must find other particles like the Mirror Higgs Boson that fit into our model of the missing heavy elements. David Dunsky, Lawrence J. Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. Theoretical Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. and Keisuke Harigaya, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, U.S.A. have submitted the following research: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FJHEP02%282020%29078   Showing Dark matter, dark radiation, and gravitational waves from mirror Higgs parity. Some of the other mirror particles shown here are mirror bosons, mirror gluons, mirror photons, mirror quarks, and a possible unknown dark matter particle. However, the significance in this article is the possibility that the neutron to proton ratio is altered. (See sentence 12 in Fig 18 above) Why is this important? When we look at my new periodic table, there is a deficit of 8 protons (in the 8 missing elements) and since the proton determines Atomic Number, i.e. Xe = Xenon = 54 but No = Nobelium = 102 not the 110 of my PTOE, how can that be possible? All of the above data points to the possibility that these 8 elements do exist as heavy rare earths with nucleonic and orbital mirror particles and are therefore mirror/dark matter elements themselves. Let us go a little further down the rabbit hole. Perhaps beginning with the magic square will help.

Table 5 — Magic Square Lie Algebras 

Table 5 Credits: A magic square from Yang-Mills squared,  L. Borsten,_ M. J. Du_,y L. J. Hughes,z and S. Nagyx Theoretical Physics, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom (Dated: January 8, 2015)

What is of particular interest to my research is the O column where it intersects the O row. This is the Octooctonionic projective plane with a supersymmetric of 16, 128 degrees of freedom, 248 dimensions in the SO(16) 120. These figures all come together below.

Here is a research article in 2017 that says a lot about the ratio of neutrons to protons in the early universe when the baryonic matter was formed. From the State of Israel, “Mirror neutrons as dark matter in the Mirror Twin Two Higgs Doublet Model” by Hugues Beauchesne, Department of Physics, Ben-Gurion University,

Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00052

A simple way to have the dark matter consist mostly of mirror neutrons without
introducing any hard breaking of the Z2 symmetry is instead to have a Two Higgs Doublet
Model and a copy of it, or a so-called Mirror Twin Two Higgs Doublet Model (MT2HDM).
In any case, the Z2 symmetry must be broken to pass the Higgs signal strengths constraints. Even some soft or spontaneous breaking will in general result in a tan β in the mirror sector that differs from its SM value. As such, the Yukawa couplings might be the same in the two sectors, but the ratio of quark masses can be considerably different in the SM and mirror sectors. By making the ratio of the mirror up and down quarks sufficiently large, the mirror proton can be made heavier than the mirror neutron. This results in at least a reduced abundance of dark protons, but also the possibilities of free mirror protons being unstable or even mirror protons being unstable in all the bound states with sizable abundances.

Dark Matter through the Higgs portal

Giorgio Arcadi, Abdelhak Djouadi, Martti Raidal

“We review scenarios in which the particles that account for the Dark Matter (DM) in the Universe interact only through their couplings with the Higgs sector of the theory, the so-called Higgs-portal models. In a first step, we use a general and model-independent approach in which the DM particles are singlets with spin 0, ½, or 1, and assume a minimal Higgs sector with the presence of only the Standard Model (SM) Higgs particle observed at the LHC. In a second step, we discuss non-minimal scenarios in which the spin-½ DM particle is accompanied by additional lepton partners and consider several possibilities like sequential, singlet-doublet and vector-like leptons. In a third step, we examine the case in which it is the Higgs sector of the theory which is enlarged either by a singlet scalar or pseudoscalar field, an additional two Higgs doublet field or by both; in this case, the matter content is also extended in several ways. Finally, we investigate the case of supersymmetric extensions of the SM with neutralino DM, focusing on the possibility that the latter couples mainly to the neutral Higgs particles of the model which then serve as the main portals for DM phenomenology. In all these scenarios, we summarize and update the present constraints and future prospects from the collider physics perspective, namely from the determination of the SM Higgs properties at the LHC and the search for its invisible decays into DM, and the search for heavier Higgs bosons and the DM companion particles at high-energy colliders. We then compare these results with the constraints and prospects obtained from the cosmological relic abundance as well as from direct and indirect DM searches in astroparticle physics experiments. The complementarily of collider and astroparticle DM searches is investigated in all the considered models.”As you will see below that Dark Matter particle creation thru the Higgs portal plays a  role in my PTOE theory. Note the placement of the spin -½ DM particles. (see figure 22 below)

Chapter 10

India’s Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics

Here is more research that is being done on “….a set of exotic nuclei, which are not found in the Periodic Table.” This research is being conducted by The Indian Lattice Gauge Theory Initiative, (ILGTI) https://phys.org/news/2019-10-deuteron-like-heavy-dibaryonsa-exotic-nuclei.html. See (figure 20 below):

We report the first lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) study of deuteronlike ($np$-like) dibaryons with heavy quark flavors. These include particles with the following dibaryon structures and valence quark contents: ${\Sigma }_c{\Xi }_{cc}\left(uucucc\right)$, ${\Omega }_c{\Omega }_{cc}\left(sscscc\right)$, ${\Sigma }_b{\Xi }_{bb}\left(uububb\right)$, ${\Omega }_b{\Omega }_{bb}\left(ssbsbb\right)$, and ${\Omega }_{ccb}{\Omega }_{cbb}\left(ccbcbb\right)$, and with spin ($J$) parity ($P$), $J^P\equiv 1^{+}$. Using a state-of-the-art lattice QCD calculation, after controlling relevant systematic errors, we unambiguously find that the ground state masses of dibaryons ${\Omega }_c{\Omega }_{cc}\left(sscscc\right)$, ${\Omega }_b{\Omega }_{bb}\left(ssbsbb\right)$, and ${\Omega }_{ccb}{\Omega }_{cbb}\left(ccbcbb\right)$ are below their respective two-baryon thresholds, suggesting the presence of bound states that are stable under strong and electromagnetic interactions. We also predict their masses precisely. For dibaryons ${\Sigma }_c{\Xi }_{cc}\left(uucucc\right)$, and ${\Sigma }_b{\Xi }_{bb}\left(uububb\right)$, we could not reach to a definitive conclusion about the presence of any bound state due to large systematics associated with these states. We also find that the binding of these dibaryons becomes stronger as they become heavier in mass. This study also opens up the possibility of the existence of many other exotic nuclei, which can be formed through the fusion of heavy baryons, similar to the formation of nuclei of elements in the periodic table.

Here is a summary of their findings (source is Nature, p 551, Volume 89):

Have you ever wondered how the Sun creates the energy that we get from it every day and how the other elements besides hydrogen have formed in our universe? Perhaps you know that this is due to fusion reactions where four nuclei of hydrogen join together to produce a helium nucleus. Such nucleosynthesis processes are possible solely due to the existence, in the first place, of stable deuterons, which are made up of a proton and a neutron. Probing deeper, one finds that a deuteron consists of six light quarks. Interestingly, the strong interaction between quarks, which brings stability to deuterons, also allows for various other six-quark combinations, leading to the possible formation of many other deuteron-like nuclei. However, no such nuclei, though theoretically speculated about and searched for experimentally many times, have yet been observed

All this may change with an exciting new finding, where, using a state-of-the-art first-principles calculation of lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the basic theory of strong interactions, a definite prediction of the existence of other deuteron-like nuclei has been made by TIFR’s physicists. Using the computational facility of the Indian Lattice Gauge Theory Initiative (ILGTI), Prof. Nilmani Mathur and postdoctoral fellow Parikshit Junnarkar in the Department of Theoretical Physics have predicted a set of exotic nuclei, which are not found in the Periodic Table. The masses of these new exotic nuclei have also been calculated precisely.

These new subatomic particles could either be made of six heavy quarks (charm and bottom) or heavy and strange quarks. They are stable against strong and electromagnetic decay, but—unlike the deuteron—they can decay through weak interactions. Surprisingly, it has been found that the stability of such nuclei increases as they become heavier. These predictions may aid in discovering these new subatomic particles at experimental facilities.

This also opens up the possibility of the existence of many other exotic nuclei, which can be formed through the fusion of heavy baryons, similar to the formation of nuclei of elements in the Periodic Table. In such reactions, these deuteron-like nuclei could well play the same role as the deuteron in nucleosynthesis. The formation of these new subatomic particles also enhances the possibility of a quark-level analogue of nuclear fusion as discussed recently [Nature 551, 89 (2017)]. The formation of some of these states through fusion is highly exothermic, releasing energy as large as 300 MeV/reaction—an exciting possibility for energy creation someday in the future!

(Figure 20, Credit Nature, p 551, Volume 89))

I have not found what is meant by “….a set of exotic nuclei”, however, I suspect that they are a part of the 8 missing/un-named elements I have been proposing. Another interesting finding is that the stability of these new nuclei increases when they become heavier, leading me to think that their natural existence on Earth may be possible after all, another pleasant coincidence.

Below is a good description of the Rosenfeld Projective Plane

Around 1956, Boris Rosenfeld had the remarkable idea that just as is the isometry group of the projective plane over the octonions, the exceptional Lie groups,  and  are the isometry groups of projective planes over the following three algebras, respectively:

• the bioctonions, ,
• the quateroctonions, ,
• the octooctonions, .

There is definitely something right about this idea because one would expect these projective planes to have dimensions 32, 64, and 128, and there indeed do exist compact Riemannian manifolds with these dimensions having,  and  as their isometry groups. The problem is that the bioctonions, quateroctonions, and octooctonions are not division algebras, so it is a nontrivial matter to define projective planes over them!

(Credit, https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/node16.html )(please note the quarteroctonionic are EVI E7(7) and the “Octooctonionic” are EVIII E8(8) planes) https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/node22.html#Rosenfeld1

“Theorists using the well-accepted theory of Quantum Electrodynamics to calculate the effects of the quantum fluctuations in the vacuum, predict that the velocity of light can be changed by Casimir stresses induced in the vacuum by the presence of a pair of closely spaced conducting plates. It is not yet known, but it is suspected, that the same Casimir stresses will cause a change in the inertial mass of an object. (Gravity)  It is my belief that lessening gravity for the human body can lengthen Telomeres.  This would be a gradual and/or possibly an extended period of time.    Studies should be done on those who spend longer times floating in water where the effects of gravity is greatly reduced. Hopfully any current studies of extended stays beneath the ocean are including a study of telomere length. The effect is minute, but it may be possible to design an experiment using a nuclear magnetic resonance free precession technique to measure that change in the inertial mass. The result of the experiment will either be that the inertial mass of a body can be changed, or that our theories of the vacuum must be changed. The implications for either experimental result will be significant.”

The remaining paragraphs of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

”The model accepted here is that the cosmos underwent rapid expansion or inflation at its origin, following which it became stable and static at its present size. This expansion process fed energy into the vacuum. This energy manifested as the smallest particles the cosmos is capable of producing, namely Planck particle pairs (PPP). PPP have a unique property; their dimensions are also those of their own Compton wavelengths.77 Each pair is positively and negatively charged so that the net result is that the vacuum is electrically neutral. Because quantum uncertainty only exists as a result of the ZPE according to SED physics, then there was no time limit initially for these particles to remain in existence as a physical reality. Furthermore, since the Planck length is the cutoff wavelength for the ZPE, these particles were thereby unaffected by the ZPE as it built up during the expansion process. As the cosmos continued to expand, the separation between particles 14 increased, and the turbulence among the PPP resulted in spin. The separation between these charges gave rise to electric fields, while their spin created magnetic fields. This may be considered to be the origin of the primordial electromagnetic fields of the ZPE. By this means, the energy of the expansion was converted into the Zero Point Energy.”

The competing theory for the origin of the ZPF comes from what has heretofore been an obscure discipline within physics known as stochastic ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 192 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY electrodynamics, a modern version of much earlier twentieth-century investigations by Einstein, Max Planck, Walther Nernst, Ludwig Hopf and Otto Stern. Stochastic electrodynamics postulates that the ZPF is as real as any other radiation field. In such a view the existence of a real ZPF is as fundamental as the existence of the universe itself. The only difference between stochastic electrodynamics and ordinary classical physics is the single assumption of the presence of this all-pervasive, real ZPF, which happens to be an intrinsic part of the universe

Whether the ZPF arises from quantum laws or is simply an intrinsic part of the universe, an important question remains: Why do people not sense the presence of the radiation if indeed it is made up of real electromagnetic waves spanning the spectrum of radio waves, light and X rays? The idea that space could be filled with a vast sea of energy does seem to contradict everyday experience. The answer to the question lies in the utter uniformity and isotropy of the field. There is no way to sense something that is absolutely the same everywhere, outside and inside everything. To put the matter in everyday terms, if you lie perfectly still in a tub of water at body temperature, you cannot feel the heat of the water.

Motion through a medium almost always gives rise to asymmetries, which then makes it possible to detect the medium. But in the case of the ZPF, motion through space at a constant velocity does not make the field detectable, because the field has the property of being “Lorentz invariant.” (Lorentz invariance is a critical difference between the modern ZPF and nineteenth-century concepts of an ether.) The field becomes detectable only when a body is accelerated through space. In the mid-1970s the physicists Paul C. W. Davies, now at the University of Adelaide in Australia, and William G. Unruh, now at the University of British Columbia, showed that as a moving observer accelerates through the ZPF, the ZPF spectrum becomes distorted, and the distortion increases with increasing acceleration. Can the distortion be seen? Yes indeed, but not with one’s eyes, because the energies involved are minute. ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 193 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY Although the distortion is small, it is extremely important: our analysis shows that it is the origin of inertia. In an article published last February in Physical Review A, we showed that when an electromagnetically interacting particle is accelerated through the ZPF, a force is exerted on the charge; the force is directly proportional to the acceleration but acts in the direction opposite to it. In other words, the charge experiences an electromagnetic force as resistance to acceleration. We interpret the resistance associated with the charge as the very inertia Newton regarded as an innate property of matter.

“The Einstein-Hopf process would be an interesting, but irrelevant, curiosity were it not for one peculiarity that sets the electromagnetic quantum vacuum apart from other radiation fields: the shape of its spectrum. The shape is exactly proportional to the frequency cubed — precisely the right shape to be “Lorentz invariant.” A spectrum with this shape does not produce a Doppler effect. The photons that a gas particle meets head-on in the quantum vacuum are no more energetic than those that strike the particle from behind. Consequently, the photons can offer no concerted resistance to uniform motion. (The spectrum and directional distribution of photons, however, do change for particles that are accelerating; this is the origin of inertia in our theory, as discussed in the box on p. 15.) This idiosyncrasy of the vacuum electromagnetic field throws the EinsteinHopf process out of balance (see figure on p. 14). Once gas particles are set in motion by the random fluctuations of the electromagnetic field, nothing can stop them. Over millions of years they accelerate steadily, reaching velocities near to that of light and moving across astronomical distances. Astrophysicists are no strangers to this mechanism. Twenty years ago, one of us proposed it as a possible source of the most energetic cosmic rays. Most cosmic rays consist of electrons, protons, and ions, but those of extremely high energy are missing the electrons. The Einstein-Hopf process would explain this, because it operates more efficiently on protons and ions than on electrons. What no one had considered was that this process could also segregate matter on a cosmological scale. When we first looked into the matter, the Einstein-Hopf process sounded too good to be true. By transferring energy from virtual photons into real particles, would the process yield something for nothing? To check, we teamed up with IBM physicist Daniel Cole, an expert on the quantum vacuum. For over five years, Cole had been assessing whether theories of the vacuum violate any basic principles, such as the conservation of mass-energy or the second law of thermodynamics. He was able to find nothing amiss with the quantum Einstein-Hopf mechanism. Emptiness Begets Emptiness The Einstein-Hopf process works best in places where particles hardly ever collide with each other, since collisions prevent the particles from building up speed. The less matter there is, the more the matter wants to go ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 200 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY someplace else. Thus the tendency is for regions of low density to empty out even more, and for regions of high density to become denser. This is exactly the sort of snowball effect that cosmologists have been looking for to explain how matter congregated to form sheets and walls. At some point, the acceleration must have come to an end, or else all matter would have clumped into a single mega-galaxy. We believe that the end drew near when the agglomerating sheets developed appreciable magnetic fields. As the particles scurried into sheets, they dragged along their primordial magnetic fields. Those fields piled up, creating a magnetic pressure that ultimately balanced the Einstein-Hopf evacuation process. Gravity took over to form smaller structures, such as galaxies. The end result, we proposed last spring in The Astrophysical Journal, was the honeycombed structure of the universe.”

Exactly, what is Q.E.D. or quantum elctro-dynamics?

In the 1920s, studies carried out by Albert Einstein and E. Cartan laid the foundation of the theory that became subsequent known as the ECT (Einstein-Cartan Theory). The idea stemmed originally from Cartan, who at the beginning of the Century speculated about fields generated by angular momentum density. This idea was later elaborated independently by a number of Russian physicists including N. Myshkin and V. Belyaev. They claim to have discovered the natural manifestations of enduring torsion fields. Presently,  Akimov and his team consider the quantum vacuum as a universal torsion wave carrying medium. The torsion field is said to fill all of space isotropically including its matter component. It has a quantal structure that is unobservable in non-disturbed states. However, violations of vacuum symmetry and invariance create different (and in principle observable) states. The torsion field theory takes a modified form of the original electron- positron model of the “Dirac sea”. The vacuum’s energy field is viewed as a system of rotating wave packets of electrons and positrons (rather than a sea of electron-positron pairs). Where the wave packets are mutually embedded, the field is electrically neutral. If the spins of the embedded packets have the opposite sign, the system is compensated not only in charge but also in classical spin and magnetic moment. Such a system is said to be a “phyton”. Dense ensembles of phytons are said to approximate a simplified model of the physical vacuum field. When the phytons are spin-compensated, their orientation within the ensemble is arbitrary. But when a charge q is the source of disturbance, the action produces a charge polarization of the vacuum, as prescribed by Quantum Electro Dynamics. When a mass m is the source of disturbance, the phytons  produce symmetrical oscillations along the axis given by the direction of the disturbance. The vacuum then enters a state characterized by the oscillation of the phytons along their longitudinal spinpolarization. This is interpreted as a gravitational field (i.e., G-field). The gravitational field is thus the result of vacuum decompensation arising at its point of polarization (which is an idea that was originally introduced by Sakharov). Given that the gravitational field is characterized by longitudinal waves, it 12 cannot be screened which is in accordance with observation and experiment. Hence m-disturbance produces the G-field, much as q-disturbance produces the electromagnetic field. Akimov et al. go further.

The author of the Zpower Book goes on to explain what was discovered by Roger Penrose about these superluminal phenomena.

“Akimov et al. go further. Following a thesis advanced by Roger Penrose, they represent the vacuum equations in the spinor form and thereby obtain a system of nonlinear spinor equations where 2- component spinors represent the potentials of torsion fields. These equations can describe charged as well as neutral quantum & classical particles. They thus allow that the vacuum field is disturbed not only by charge and mass but also by classical spin. In that event, the phytons oriented in the same direction as the spin of the disturbance keep their orientation. Those opposite to the spin of the source undergo inversion. Then the local region of the vacuum transits into a state of transverse spin polarization. This gives the “spin field” (S-field), viewed as a condensate of fermion pairs. As a result, Akimov et al. view the vacuum as a physical medium that can assume various polarization states. Given charge-polarization, the vacuum is manifested as the electromagnetic field. Given matter-polarization, it is manifested as the gravitational field. And given spin-polarization, the vacuum manifests as a spin field. All fundamental fields known to physics correspond to specific vacuum polarization states. Thus, the above “torsion field theory of the physical vacuum” can claim that all objects from quanta to galaxies create vortices in the vacuum. The vortices created by particles and other material objects are information carriers, linking physical events quasi-instantaneously. The group-speed of these “torsion- waves” is of the order of 109 c (i.e., one billion times the speed-of-light).”

Authors note:  What is being described above is something called,

“Superluminal Light”.   We will not go down this rabbit hole right now because this leads to things like wormholes, time travel and teleportation.

Somehow in all my research I missed the work of this great man,……….

Gravitation and Radiation,,, “Every wave is considered a compression-expansion pump. The whole universe is a giant pump. The two-way piston of the universal pump constitutes the universal heartbeat. A one-way universe is as impossible as a one way pump is possible. The compressed condition of this universe is exactly equal to the expanded condition. The compressed condition is gravitation. The expanded condition is radiation. Gravitation and radiation are equal opposites….This universe of electric waves is divided into wave fields. ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 71 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY Each wave field is equally divided by contraction of gravitation and expansion of radiation.” (A New Concept of the Universe p. 23.) “Electricity…creates tensions and strains, which we call electric potential. Electric potential is the measure of compression at any one point in the universe. Gravity is evidenced wherever compression from without is maximum. Gravity is a focal point from which matter desires to explode outwardly. Gravity does not pull inwardly from within as the deceptive illusion of Nature would have you believe. Neither is it the attractive force which Newton’s senses were deceived into believing, for a center of gravity is a point of maximum electric potential.” (Atomic Suicide, p. 89.) Electricity And Magnetism “Electricity is the power force of the universe. Electricity accumulates power into high potential from the universal constant at the sacrifice of one of its time dimensions. Electricity is the force of resistance to the established speed of the universal constant of energy…Electricity is the generative force. Magnetism is the speed force, the time force, of the universe. Magnetism dissipates the high potential power dimension and transforms it into time dimension of low potential. Magnetism is the force which works toward a return to the established motion of the universal constant of energy…Magnetism is the radiative force.” (The Universal One, p. 68.)

Chapter 11

PTOE GROUNDWORK, SPIN GROUP, and THE HALF-SPINOR

There are lingering questions now about the exact nature of my PTOE and how it fits into the QFT.  Including the perfect triads listed above, If my E(7) polytope PTOE is a representation of a stable, fully axiomized periodic table then each vertex must represent of one chemical element (or quantum particle) and the structure of my new table should provide answers as to the origin of the individual element’s electron spin angular momentum. Look again at figure 6, my PTOE and you will see that it is arranged in periods of 18 elements all of which end with an inert noble gas. Looking at the first 4 Noble elements: 18, 36, 54, and 72,  if we let each element occupy a 10° turn in a circle then the first elemental period is 180°, the next 360°, then 540° and ending with 720°. In fact, this describes the fermion (quaternionic) and the 720° rotation of the ½ spinor of total angular momentum. This now describes a new principle that bridges the gap between Quantum Chemistry and Quantum Physics. Not only does this point to the fermion quaternionic but it describes the foundation of a new a priori principle inscribing the table’s periodicity and therefore all chemical and quantum laws, rules, and principles that flow from it. The following quote from Wikipedia is a summation of how spinor rotation works into my theory……” Although spinors can be defined purely as elements of a representation space of the spin group (or its Lie algebra of infinitesimal rotations), they are typically defined as elements of a vector space that carries a linear representation of the Clifford algebra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associative_algebra. The Clifford algebra is an associative algebra that can be constructed from Euclidean space and its inner product in a basis-independent way. Both the spin group and its Lie algebra are embedded inside the Clifford algebra in a natural way, and in applications, the Clifford algebra is often the easiest to work with.  A Clifford space operates on a spinor space, and the elements of a spinor space are spinors.” Now we see that the 720° rotation ends with the missing element 72 and may explain its unusual particle physics. To understand how spinors work I am including the following figure (21) from Frank (Tony) Smith’s webbook:

“Here is a demonstration of Spinor Orientation”

“Louis H Kauffman, in his book Knots and Physics (World Scientific Publishing Co. 1991), says that a spin 1/2 particle is like a ball attached to its surroundings.  The orientation of the ball is related to the surrounding sphere by the tangle of strings connecting them.  If you rotate the ball 360 degrees, the strings are tangled, but if you go to 720 degrees, the strings get untangled.  Here is a demonstration of how the 720 degrees (4 pi) rotation works:”

Figure 21 (credit from Tony’s web-book, undated.  Smith was a graduate of Cambridge)

Please notice that the first “twist” or fibration, occurs during the rotation into the 720 degrees and ends when it completes the turn back to the Zero point. As I continue down this rabbit hole you will want to remember where you first saw a reference to the word “Twist” in figure 21.

There is an additional significance to the 72 number, besides representing the ½-spinor fermion quaternionic rotation, it also represents the 72 vertices of the E(6) polytope. So within the E(7) is the E(6) rotation that ends at element 72 (720° and spin½) which represents fermionic dark matter particles! This is just one of the inversion points (twists) where parity, time, and charge are reversed, a zero point and a view into a whole new Universe of particles.  There are 7 rotations of 180° for a total of 1260° or 126 chemical elements. How can these additional rotations be explained, especially since the third one contains 4 more missing elements and another twist? At first, I thought that there was a quantum field rebound, such as with the so-called anti-particle table before Hydrogen and in BBN but the E(7) spherical model continues without any hint of a rebound except perhaps with my element 108 which is another inert gas and ends another rotation of 360°. This would mean that elements Krypton 36 and Nihil 108 by virtue of their 360° rotation from 0° would have to be spin – ½ fermions, and being spin– ½ they would also represent mirror anti- fermions. (Please remember that my model uses the analogy of the 18 standard particles from which the particle assignment of the E(8) polytope of Lisi and the periodic table of Stowe-Scerri referenced in figure 10 are constructed) The particle assignments of my E(7) polytope in figure 12 would have to hold true including the force carriers represented by the spin 0 of Helium (Bosonic). (Bosons are just one of the several force carriers and are the round, light green dots in the particle assignment diagram)

What has all this to do with our life here on this beautiful planet?  Many scientists as well as practioners have turned to the “field” for healing the human body.

The remaining paragraphs of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

Bearden reports that the Priore device is reputed to have cured terminal tumors in laboratory animals, and is able to cure any disease, including  arteriosclerosis and cancer, by a special electrodynamic process known as “phase conjugation” or “dedifferentiation.” This process, seemingly miraculously, allegedly causes afflicted cells to return to their previously healthy state by literally turning back the clock on the disease. Bearden states that this process is a direct outgrowth of the work of American Nobel Prize nominee Dr Robert Becker, who demonstrated the use of small DC currents to heal intractable bone fractures by stimulating the growth of new bone. The trickle current apparently caused red corpuscles to shed their hemoglobin coating, grow new nuclei, and metamorphose into a much earlier, primitive version of the cells before differentiation. These cells could then be newly differentiated into needed bone cells, which would deposit themselves at the fracture point and result in a knitting of the broken bone. It is this basic process that Bearden asserts can be imported into the treatment of infectious and terminal diseases, including the restoration to health of the immune systems of people with AIDS. And, Bearden claims, the Priore mechanism can effectuate healing in a matter of minutes. The organization of the vacuum represents a change to the “primal cause” or “primal energy.” Organization of energy without the involvement of mass effects does not require work, because force is not involved and work ultimately involves the translation of a resisting mass. So one can organize the “potential for doing work” without having to perform work in doing so. This is in fact what “regauging” actually involves. Any local region of the vacuum is after all an open system far from equilibrium with the surrounding rest of the vacuum. So that local region can exhibit (i) self-ordering, (ii) self-oscillation, self-spinning, etc.; and (iii) negentropy. To use this principle in practice, the trick is to “tickle” the local vacuum into performing the exact type of reordering and self-structuring that one wishes. One does this by adroitly changing the effect side of the observation process, thereby altering the causative side as well; a discussion of this process is well-beyond the extent of this document. In mechanics and electrodynamics the interaction of the effect back upon the cause has been erroneously omitted, but it is present in general relativity since curvature of spacetime (cause) acts on massenergy (effect) to change it, and a change in mass-energy (effect) interacts back upon spacetime curvature (cause) to change it accordingly. A logical mess exists in electrodynamics, where the effect has been rather universally confused with the cause, and there exists not a single text or paper illustrating how the EM wave exists in spacetime. All illustrations continue to show the E-H planar (X-Y) wave in 3-space, which is an effect existing after the interaction with charge. What exists in spacetime before interaction must be Et-Ht, since observation itself is a d/dt operator imposed upon LLLT and producing LLL. The integration of E-H along z does not add the missing time dimension, hence merely represents a “spatial composite” of many X-Y slices. Consideration of the Et-Ht “impulse” or causal wave in spacetime prior to the interaction with matter, particularly in phase conjugation pairs, leads to many very interesting new phenomena, but that is beyond the scope of this paper.

Chapter 12

THE SMITH HYPERCUBE, Schaltenbrand Spiral, DNA Spiral, My PTOE

Whatever the QFT reason, the effect is that particles from one side may flow back and forth forming the new element 72 at the E(6)SU(2) level (spin positive to negative) and the element 108 (spin negative back to positive). Another effect is the harmonic oscillation of the elements between the two portals that accounts for the Actinoids and Lanthanoids contractions. I believe that it is these two portals (twists) that involve the point where the Graviton is created and a  true zero-point.  I believe it is the oscillation of this force(G) that carries thru the entire field of the table affecting all the elements and therefore some of their anomalous features. There are many other phenomena that this creates. You can see this better by looking at Frank Smith’s articles in Figures 11 and 15 where he shows the 8 particles in two different configurations. To visualize the idea of how the Higgs mechanism portals function and the idea of the quantum field rotations, look at the Schaltenbrand spiral with my PTOE format in figure 22 below:

Figure 22 (My Schaltenbrand spiral with the added P.T.O.E. format and Portals)

While the Schaltenbrand spiral is 100 years old this year, I found it very useful for explaining not only periodicity but also my new concept of quantum field rotations and the Higgs mechanism portal placement. Notice that my new PTOE takes the form of an arrowhead pointing both directions in space showing that the harmonic energy of the Quantum field can flow either way.

The first thing in Fig 22 that you notice is the amazing synchronicity between the noble gases’ atomic numbers and the degrees of rotation x10, for instance, Argon 18 – 180°, Krypton 36 – 360°, Xenon 54 – 540°, Nihil** 72 – 720°, Radon 90 – 900°, Nihil** 108 – 1080° and Oganesson 126 – 1260°. Nay Sayers will quickly dismiss this because of the missing 8 protons but are they really missing? I think not. When you carefully look at the chart of heavy nuclides one can find an exact match of isotopic numbers in the series that are 4 atomic numbers ahead of each one of the missing elements (8 spaces for the heavier elements). This may be one reason why there was so much confusion, early on, about the placement of the “Ytterby” series of heavy rare earth elements. I think a case can be made for the saying that “form decides function”. This is strongly suggested by my PTOE polytope which coincidentally shares the 128 vertices of E(7) and whose elements align themselves in the 180° rotation through 1260° representing the new atomic number 126 of the element Oganesson, a noble gas. (There are of course 7 rotations matching the 7-dimensional circles of the E(7) polytope plus the two polar vertices which I assigned to Hydrogen and Helium). If you are still having doubts about the structure of the new periodic table look at the following table’s diagram with the Schaltenbrand spiral: (Fig 23)

Fig 23 (Harry Tasset)

The two tables above are separated by the Schaltenbrand spiral and show the progression of angular spin rotation starting with 180° and terminating with 1260°. The left and right tables are separated by odd and even sums of their principal quantum number and the orbital quantum number of their outer electron subshells. So the left table is n + l = odd and the right is n + l = even. This clearly shows the secondary periodicity of the two subsets that naturally flow from the coincidental angular spin rotation of the groups defined by their noble gases. e.g. 720° = spin ½ and 1080° = spin -½. It is the two S7 twists at 720° and 1080° that may lead to the curious creation of matter/dark matter through the Higgs mechanism at field points # 72 and # 108. The tables also exhibit internal periodicity when you evenly split the rows. For instance, Sc-Mn and Fe-Zn repeat and internal d-shell internal periodicity. Both left and right tables have this property.  Each side has 64 elements for a total of 128.  The DNA analogy continues with the 64 curiously mirroring the 64 codons of  DNA and RNA.

The remaining paragraphs of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

“The model accepted here is that the cosmos underwent rapid expansion or inflation at its origin, following which it became stable and static at its present size. This expansion process fed energy into the vacuum. This energy manifested as the smallest particles the cosmos is capable of producing, namely Planck particle pairs (PPP). PPP have a unique property; their dimensions are also those of their own Compton wavelengths.77 Each pair is positively and negatively charged so that the net result is that the vacuum is electrically neutral. Because quantum uncertainty only exists as a result of the ZPE according to SED physics, then there was no time limit initially for these particles to remain in existence as a physical reality. Furthermore, since the Planck length is the cutoff wavelength for the ZPE, these particles were thereby unaffected by the ZPE as it built up during the expansion process. As the cosmos continued to expand, the separation between particles 14 increased, and the turbulence among the PPP resulted in spin. The separation between these charges gave rise to electric fields, while their spin created magnetic fields. This may be considered to be the origin of the primordial electromagnetic fields of the ZPE. By this means, the energy of the expansion was converted into the Zero Point Energy.”

“The first explanation … is that the zero-point energy was fixed arbitrarily at the birth of the Universe, as part of its so-called boundary conditions.”

” A second school of thought proposes” that “the sum of all particle motions throughout the Universe generates the zero-point fields” and that in turn “the zero-point fields drive the motion of all particles of matter in the Universe … as a self-regenerating cosmological feedback cycle.”  On this second explanation the ZPE plus atomic and virtual particles require the existence of each other.”

Chapter 13

Angular Momentum and Nuclear Shell Configuration

Angular momentum plays an important role in complicated nuclear shell configurations. Here is an excellent reference from Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_shell_model because it answered a vexing question about why element 72 is the table’s first fibration (twist):

(Credit Wikipedia)

Since E(6) lives inside the E(7) then the above may point to a solution for this puzzle. It could be a modern rule similar to the Madelung rule which required a deeper investigation. Moreover, how about the DNA spiral with 64 hexagrams? (64 x 2 = 128) another amazing coincidence and something future medical science can investigate.

I would like to say a few words here about my creative process.  The below graphic is but  one of the  thousands of papers in my  library generated from the 50 years of thought and research about this subject.  Today’s scientists and authors reading this are probably  laughing at the time it took for me to bring forth the proof for this subject and I can now quietly laugh to myself.  The most productive years were those in the last 4 years from 2017 to the present.

During that time I was guided by inspiration, the same inspiration that I have when writing spiritual prose or poetry.  I love Haiku and the spiritual works of Kahlil Gibran and the prose of Teilhard de Chardin.  I have studied  the Metaphysics  of  Charles and Myrtle Fillmore along with Meditation throughout the time that I was creating my PTOE and know that most of my inspiration came from my a Greater Devine Power.  My father, Everett was also a creative inspiration throughout my life, having invented  and patented many things like a scoop for my tricycle, a very sophisticated rotary pump and a rake-tooth harrow for farming.  I could probably write a book on my spiritual poetry and prose but I always believed that the greater good for myself and mankind would come from my studies of the periodic table.

The above graphic shows clearly the Star of David otherwise know in ancient text as the key of Solomon.  It also appears at the middle of Lisi’s beautiful polytope.  I do believe that the people of that day had possession of some of the secrets that we are just now uncovering.  As you saw in chapter 8,  Vedic text had already compiled many pages of nuclear science.  Why do I mention this now?  I want to impress on the reader that I am only an amateur scientist and realize that men who were and are far more skilled at the laws of mathematics and physics,  people like those in the following pages taken from the fine work at the ZPE Corporation, among them a great scientist by the name of Hal Putoff.

The concluding comment in Puthoff’s paper carries unusual significance. It reads: “Finally, it is seen that a well-defined, precise quantitative argument can be made that the ground state of the hydrogen atom is defined by a dynamic equilibrium in which the collapse of the state is prevented by the presence of the zero-point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. This carries with it the attendant implication that the stability of matter itself is largely mediated by ZPF phenomena in the manner described here, a concept that transcends the usual interpretation of the role and significance of zero-point fluctuations of the vacuum electromagnetic field”  61. H. E. Puthoff, Physical Review D, 35:3266 (1987).”

Puthoff explained as follows: “The circular motion [of an electron in its orbit] can be thought of as two harmonic oscillator motions at right angles and 90 degrees out of phase, superimposed. These two oscillators are driven by the resonant components of the ZPE just as you would keep a kid swinging on a swing by resonantly-timed pushes. The oscillator motion acts as a filter to select out the energy at the right frequency (around 450 angstroms wavelength for the hydrogen atom Bohr orbit ground state).”  Energy is moved from the Zero Point Fields (ZPF) to keep electrons in atomic orbits by this means.  H. E. Puthoff, Physical Review D, 35:3266 (1987).

Earlier, I alluded to the idea that we may soon have gravity free cars that have their own flight level in our sky.  This was not just idle speculation.  Back in 1994 Hal Putoff and Bernie Haisch and Al Rueda demonstrated mathematically that anti-gravity was more than speculation.  Here is their research from the ZPE document:

“In 1994, Bernhard Haisch,  Alfonso Rueda, and Harold Puthoff gave a mathematical demonstration that inertia can be considered a vacuum-based Lorentz force. The force originates at the subparticle level and produces opposition to the acceleration of material objects. The accelerated motion of objects through the vacuum produces a magnetic field. The particles that constitute the objects are deflected by this field. The larger the object, the more particles it contains. Hence the stronger the deflection and greater the inertia. Inertia is thus a form of electromagnetic resistance arising in accelerated frames from the distortion of the Zero-Point (and otherwise superfluid) Field of the vacuum.”

The paper goes on to explain that mass is an unnecessary concept in physics.

“More than inertia, mass also appears to be a product of vacuum interaction. If Haisch and collaborators are right, the concept of “mass” is neither fundamental nor even necessary in physics. When the mass-less electric charges of the vacuum (i.e., the bosons that make up the superfluid  Zero Point Field) interact with the electromagnetic field beyond the already-noted threshold of energy, mass is effectively “created”. Thus, “mass” may be a structure condensed from vacuum energy rather than a fundamental given in the Universe. If mass is a product of vacuum energy, so is gravitation. Gravity, as we know, is always associated with mass, obeying the inverse square law (i.e., drops off proportionately to the square of the distance between the gravitating masses). Hence if mass is produced in interaction with the ZPF, then also the force that is associated with mass must be so produced. This, however, means that all the fundamental characteristics we normally associate with matter are vacuum field-interaction products: inertia, mass, as well as gravity.”

In a flash of genius, Hal Putoff reached the following conclusion:

    “It turns out that the two were identical.”  In the Abstract, Hal Puthoff summarizes the results as follows: “the ground state of the hydrogen atom can be precisely defined as resulting from a dynamic equilibrium between radiation emitted due to acceleration of the electron in its ground state orbit and radiation absorbed from the zero-point fluctuations of the background vacuum electromagnetic field…”

He also explains the astrophysical implications of the theory.

“On this basis, then, it seems that atomic orbit energies are sustained by the ZPE. It is therefore possible that, if the energy density of the ZPE were to vary significantly, then all atomic structures throughout the cosmos might be expected to adjust their orbit energies in accord with the sustaining power available from the vacuum. Now orbit energies go in quantum jumps, and it appears that orbit radii have remained constant throughout time, otherwise the change in the sizes of atoms would result in defects in crystals called dislocations, which are not generally observed. It might thus be anticipated that any changes in the energy density of the ZPE might have to cross a quantum threshold before atoms took up their new energy state. For example, if the strength of the ZPE was lower in the past, then, as a series of quantum thresholds was reached, atomic orbit energies might also be expected to decrease in a set of jumps. The light emitted by atomic processes would therefore be redder in a series jumps as we look back in time, since the red end of the spectrum is the low energy end.”

The isotope used was lithium-7, with a nucleus of spin 1=3/2, caused by an unpaired p3/2 proton. The four energy levels of a nucleus of spin 3/2 in a magnetic field are normally equally spaced. The three resonant frequencies between the four states are the same and there is a single resonance. If the mj=±3/2 energy levels are shifted with respect to the mj=±l/2 levels, then the single resonance is split into a triplet. The minimum splitting detectable is usually limited by inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, so a weak uniform field is desirable. The magnetic field used in the experiment was the earth’s field. In the experiment, the lithium-7 sample, in the form of a solution of lithium nitrate, was contained in a plastic bottle surrounded by a coil placed with its axis perpendicular to the direction of the earth’s field. A direct current through the loop produced a field of about 200 gauss. When this field was switched off rapidly, the resultant nuclear magnetic moment precessed about the earth’s field and an alternating e.m.f. signal was generated in the coil. With no anisotropy to cause shifts in the energy levels, there would be a single resonant frequency present and the signal would decay exponentially with a time constant equal to the transverse relaxation time of the spin system. If, however, an anisotropy in inertial mass exists, the resonance response would be split into a close triplet, and the signal would exhibit beats, corresponding to interference between the oscillations at the three resonance frequencies. Very long beat periods would show up as changes in the decay curve shape and 1/e time as the experimental parameters that changed the anisotropy were varied. In Drever’s null experiment, the rotation of the earth changed the direction with respect to the Galactic center once a sidereal day. No variation was found. This corresponds to [Drever (1961)]: “an upper limit for the ratio of the anisotropic part of the inertial mass of a proton to the isotropic part of the order of 5×10~23 .” It should be noted at this point that the lithium-7 nuclei being measured were in a non-symmetric chemical compound, were surrounded by non-symmetric polar water molecules, and a large fraction of them were up against container walls, yet these nonsymmetric surroundings did not induce shifts in the magnetic energy levels that would mimic a differential shift in the energy levels caused by an anisotropic inertial mass of the nucleus. The fundamental beauty of the Drever experiment is that the nucleus is “self-referencing” in that the mj=±3/2 and ±1/2 nuclear magnetic states produce identical transition frequencies despite large and non-symmetric changes in the surrounding environment that can produce large changes in the absolute energies of the magnetic states but do not produce differential shifts between the 3/2 and 1/2 states. This probably occurs 18 largely because the nucleus is small in size compared to the distances to neighboring perturbing atoms. It is only when the nucleus itself changes by developing an anisotropy in inertial mass, that the transition freguencies change with respect to each other and produce the beat notes. The beat notes are the signal that something has happened.

Chapter 14

SPINORS, HIGGS MECHANISM PORTALS, and THE CLOCKWORK MECHANISM

To explain these new discoveries we must return to the 8 dim Hyper-Cube of Frank (Tony) Smith in figure 15 where it is split into two levels of 128 vertices each. As shown in that figure, 128 of those are assigned to mirror fermion status and would therefore be candidates for dark matter.  For a better understanding of how he built his theory from Clifford algebras, look at the below reasoning using Hopf fibrations and twisted S7. Please notice that the S7 has two twists in it before expanding to Spin(8), for a total of three:

The subject of spinors is complicated but even more complicated is the idea of the Higgs portal which has been receiving a lot of research lately and may provide some answers for the structured building mechanism of the absent 8 chemical elements referred to in figure 20.  It would be good here to repeat the quote from Wikipedia ……”A Clifford space operates on a spinor space, and the elements of a spinor space are spinors.” Here is an excellent article on this subject involving the Clockwork Mechanism of the Higgs portal:https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C10&q=Clockwork+Higgs+portal+model+for+freeze-in+dark+matter+Jinsu+Kim1&btnG=

Clockwork Higgs portal model for freeze-in dark matter Jinsu Kim1,* and John McDonald2,† 1 Quantum Universe Center, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 02455, Korea 2 Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom from PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 023533 (2018): “The clockwork mechanism can explain interactions which are dimensionally very weak without the need for very large mass scales. We present a model in which the clockwork mechanism generates the very small Higgs portal coupling and dark matter particle mass necessary to explain cold dark matter via the freeze-in mechanism. We introduce a TeV-scale scalar clockwork sector which couples to the Standard Model via the Higgs portal. The dark matter particle is the lightest scalar of the clockwork sector. We show that the freeze-in mechanism is dominated by the decay of the heavy clockwork scalars to light dark matter scalars and Higgs bosons. In the model considered, we find that freeze-in dark matter is consistent with the clockwork mechanism for global charge q in the range 2≲ q ≲ 4 when the number of massive scalars is in the range 10 ≤ N ≤ 20. The dark matter scalar mass and portal coupling are independent of q and N. For a typical TeV-scale clockwork sector, the dark matter scalar mass is predicted to be of the order of a MeV.”

Here is a very simple graphic showing how the “clockwork mechanism” functions:

(note that the many references I have included here are given from the framework of BBN or Big Bang Nucleosynthesis via the newly found Higgs Mechanism which includes the supernovae etc. creation mechanisms in Tony Smith’s graphic next)  The simple clockwork diagram won’t seem too simple once you realize that it represents the flow of over a Million Electron Volts.

Putoff:

“Dirac field states: the superposition of two single particle electron states and the superposition of two multi-electron-positron states (Vollick, 1998; Yu and Shu, 2003). In the former (latter), the energy densities can be negative when two single (multi-) particle states have the same number of electrons (electrons and positrons) or when one state has one more electron (electron-positron pair) than the other.”

“Substantial theoretical and experimental work has shown that in many quantum systems the limits to measurement precision imposed by the quantum vacuum zero-point fluctuations (ZPF) can be breached by decreasing the noise in one observable (or measurable quantity) at the expense of increasing the noise in the conjugate observable; at the same time the variations in the first observable, say the energy, are reduced below the ZPF such that the energy becomes “negative.” “Squeezing” is thus the control of quantum fluctuations and corresponding uncertainties, whereby one can squeeze the variance of one (physically important) observable quantity provided the variance in the (physically unimportant) conjugate variable is stretched/increased. The squeezed quantity possesses an unusually low variance, meaning less variance than would be expected on the basis of the equipartition theorem. One can in principle exploit quantum squeezing to extract energy from one place in the ordinary vacuum at the expense of accumulating excess energy elsewhere “(Morris and Thorne, 1988).

(note that the many references I have included here are given from the framework of BBN or Big Bang Nucleosynthesis via the newly found Higgs Mechanism which includes the supernovae etc. creation mechanisms in Tony Smith’s graphic next) The simple clockwork diagram won’t seem too simple once you realize that it represents the flow of over a Million Electron Volts.

Here is a long and detailed explanation of the Higgs mechanism from Wikipedia.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism

“Suppose that a superconductor contains bosons with charge q. The wavefunction of the bosons can be described by introducing a quantum field, ψ, which obeys the Schrödinger equation as a field equation. In units where the reduced Planck constant, ħ, is set to 1: ( see equation in the above link) {\displaystyle i{\partial \over \partial t}\psi ={(\nabla -iqA)^{2} \over 2m}\psi .}The operator ψ(x) annihilates a boson at the point x, while its adjoint ψ† creates a new boson at the same point. The wavefunction of the Bose–Einstein condensate is then the expectation value ψ of ψ(x), which is a classical function that obeys the same equation. The interpretation of the expectation value is that it is the phase that one should give to a newly created boson so that it will coherently superpose with all the other bosons already in the condensate.”

AFB:

“This is to me is a zero point where matter is annihilated and re-created at the same point in the field.  I believe this is the point in my table where the massive nuclei of the large missing elements are created.  This is the reason for the Higgs mechanism and its purpose is to create  matter from the field.

This meta-process may be at the center of the “….highly exothermic reaction”  referred to by the Mumbai Scientists.  The creation of these new elements in the middle of the new periodic table may also lead to a new science dedicated to harvesting this amazing new form of energy, similar to the nuclear frontier of the last century.”

A whole new generation of scientists are now working on this technology and some say they will be in production of the new power plants and gravity-free cars by 2030.  I only hope that my studies of the periodic table can contribute to their success and that Earth can be saved, before it is too late,  from the ecological disaster that man has created.  As Lords of the Earth we have crushed other species beneath our feet and nature may not forgive us.

The following paragraphs in “quotes”  of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

Many researchers see the vacuum as a central ingredient of 21st-Century physics. Some even believe the vacuum may be harnessed to provide a limitless supply of energy. This report summarizes an attempt to find an experiment that would test the Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff, HRP conjecture that the mass and inertia of a body are induced effects brought about by changes in the quantum fluctuation energy of the vacuum.

The fluctuations of the vacuum in empty space will accelerate charged particles in regions of space of low density and low magnetic fields until the particles become very high energy cosmic rays.   They show that it is possible to create intense photon radiation when two conducting plates are modulated periodically.

In 1911 Planck predicted the existence of the ZPE and indicated that what is now Planck’s constant h was a measure of its strength.67-68 Importantly, both experimentally obtained and officially declared values of Planck’s constant have increased with time. This trend in the declared values of h is graphed in the second graph linked here (http://www.setterfield.org/graphs). In 1965, Sanders noted that the increasing value of h can only partly be accounted for by improvements in instrumental resolution and changes in listed values of other constants.69 It is quantitatively inadequate to blame the increase in h on these factors. This suggests that the strength of the ZPE has increased with time, since h is a measure of this quantity. But this is not the only evidence.

It has been shown that the speed of light is inversely related to the strength of the ZPE.65, 70 Consequently, it is important to note that the measured values of lightspeed, c, have shown a systematic decrease with time. This confirmatory evidence was a topic of discussion by important physicists in key journals that ranged from Newcomb’s article71 in 1886 to that of Birge in 1941.72 With the inverse link between the strength of the ZPE and c, the measured decline in the values of c also indicates an increase in the strength of the ZPE. An increasing ZPE is also supported by 13 officially declared values of electron rest mass, m, which have increased with time. (Graphs of all three quantities are online at http://www.setterfield.org/graphs). These statistical trends in the atomic constants and the 638 measurements by 41 methods upon which they are based were documented in August of 1987 in a Report ( online at http://www.setterfield.org/report/report.html) for Stanford Research Institute International by Norman and Setterfield.50 The data trends were confirmed in 1993 with an independent statistical examination (online at http://www.ldolphin.org/cdkgal.html) by Montgomery and Dolphin73. This present paper suggests that these data all point to the conclusion that the strength of the ZPE has been increasing with time cosmologically. The reason for this increase now needs to be elucidated.

Ervi  Laszlo

The secondary electromagnetic fields turn out to have a remarkable property. Between any two particles they give rise to an attractive force. The force is much weaker than the ordinary attractive or repulsive forces between two stationary electric charges, and it is always attractive, whether the charges are positive or negative. The result is that the secondary fields give rise to an attractive force we propose may be identified with gravity. It is important to note that the fluctuations are relativistic-that is, the charges move at velocities at or close to the speed of light. The energy associated with the fluctuations-which for historical reasons is given the German name zitterbewegung, or trembling movement-is interpreted as the energy equivalent of gravitational rest mass. Since the gravitational force is caused by the trembling motion, there is no need to speak any longer of a gravitational mass as the source of gravitation. The source of gravitation is the driven motion of a charge, not the attractive power of the thing physicists are used to thinking of as mass. To interpret Einstein’s equation E=mc2, we would say that mass is not equivalent to energy. Mass is energy.

Our work suggests that the conventional Newtonian idea of mass must be boldly reinterpreted. If we are correct, physical theory need no longer suppose that there is something called mass having an innate property, inertia, that resists acceleration; what is really happening, instead, is that an electromagnetic force acts on the charge inside matter to create the effect of inertia. Indeed, it appears that the more parsimonious interpretation is not even that there is charge lurking “inside matter,” but that there is only charge. The presence of charge and its interaction with the ZPF creates the forces we all experience and attribute to the existence of matter. Our interpretation would apply even to an electrically neutral particle such as the neutron, because the neutron, at the most fundamental level, is thought to be made up of smaller particles called quarks, which do carry electric charge. We have had little to say so far about the second key property for the concept of mass, the gravitation to which matter gives rise. But experimental evidence shows that an object’s inertial mass, or its resistance to acceleration, is equivalent to the object’s gravitational mass, or its mass in a gravitational field.

Most of the following paragraphs come from Bernhard Haisch who is a staff scientist at the Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory in California and a regular visiting fellow at the Max-Planck-Institut fuer extraterrestrische Physik in Garching, Germany. Alfonso Rueda is a professor of electrical engineering at California State University in Long Beach. H. E. Puthoff is director of the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, Texas.

This irreducible radiation field comes into play. In 1910, about halfway between the publication of special and general relativity, Einstein and his colleague Ludwig Hopf investigated how a thin gas would react when immersed in an electromagnetic radiation field. The radiation, they found, would have two counteracting effects on each gas particle. The particle would jiggle as photons bombarded it at random, but its motion would be opposed by a drag force due to the Doppler effect. The Doppler effect would stiffen the resistance of photons in the direction that the particle was trying to move. The particle would smack head-on into blueshifted photons, which, being more energetic than the photons from other directions, would push it back the way it came. This drag force would prevent the random jiggles of the gas particle from developing into net motion. The Einstein-Hopf process would be an interesting, but irrelevant, curiosity were it not for one peculiarity that sets the electromagnetic quantum vacuum apart from other radiation fields: the shape of its spectrum. The shape is exactly proportional to the frequency cubed — precisely the right shape to be “Lorentz invariant.” A spectrum with this shape does not produce a Doppler effect. The photons that a gas particle meets head-on in the quantum vacuum are no more energetic than those that strike the particle from behind. Consequently, the photons can offer no concerted resistance to uniform motion. (The spectrum and directional distribution of photons, however, do change for particles that are accelerating; this is the origin of inertia in our theory, as discussed in the box on p. 15.) This idiosyncrasy of the vacuum electromagnetic field throws the EinsteinHopf process out of balance (see figure on p. 14). Once gas particles are set in motion by the random fluctuations of the electromagnetic field, nothing can stop them. Over millions of years they accelerate steadily, reaching velocities near to that of light and moving across astronomical distances. Astrophysicists are no strangers to this mechanism. Twenty years ago, one of us proposed it as a possible source of the most energetic cosmic rays. Most cosmic rays consist of electrons, protons, and ions, but those of extremely high energy are missing the electrons. The Einstein-Hopf process would explain this, because it operates more efficiently on protons and ions than on electrons. What no one had considered was that this process could also segregate matter on a cosmological scale. When we first looked into the matter, the Einstein-Hopf process sounded too good to be true. By transferring energy from virtual photons into real particles, would the process yield something for nothing? To check, we teamed up with IBM physicist Daniel Cole, an expert on the quantum vacuum. For over five years, Cole had been assessing whether theories of the vacuum violate any basic principles, such as the conservation of mass-energy or the second law of thermodynamics. He was able to find nothing amiss with the quantum Einstein-Hopf mechanism. Emptiness Begets Emptiness

Bearden’s work in this last vein may owe its stimulus to his consulting assistance to home inventor “Sparky” Sweet in the 1980s. Sweet had invented an assembly of wire coils and barium ferrite magnets that would extract energy from space and produce six watts of usable power, with only a much smaller trickle of energy as input. Dubbed a “vacuum triode amplifier” (VTA) by Bearden, a later model reportedly produced 500 watts of output power, showing a net gain of 1.5 million over the input power level. Bearden theorized that Sweet’s device “tricked” the barium nuclei of the magnets into going into self-oscillation with the ambient vacuum, causing the fields of the specially conditioned “kinetic” magnets to quiver at a high level. The theorist prevailed upon Sweet to make a change in his device that would allow for a test of antigravity properties. Sweet later reported to Bearden by phone that, by increasing the power output drawn from his device by adding greater loads, he was able to reduce the weight of the VTA, as measured by a scale, by 90 percent. Concern about the likelihood of exploding the magnets prevented Sweet from reducing the VTA’s weight entirely and seeing it fly. Unfortunately, all of Sweet’s secrets about how to activate his magnets to achieve his startling results died with him in 1995, and Bearden was left to pursue his theoretical research without the benefit of a working model.”

Inverse beta decay proceeds as

νe + P —>e+ + n

Where an electron antineutrino (νe)interacts with a proton (p) to produce a positron (e+) and a neutron (n). The IBD reaction can only be initiated when the antineutrino possesses at least 1.806 MeV of kinetic energy (called the threshold energy). This threshold energy is due to a difference in mass between the products (e+and n) and the reactants(νe and p) and also slightly due to a relativistic mass effect on the antineutrino. Most of the antineutrino energy is distributed to the positron due to its small mass relative to the neutron. The positron promptly undergoes matter–antimatter annihilation after creation and yields a flash of light with energy calculated as

Evis =511 keV+511 keV+ Eνe −1806 keV= Eνe − 784 keV,

where 511 keV is the electron and positron rest energy, Evis is the visible energy from the reaction, and Eνe is the antineutrino kinetic energy. After the prompt positron annihilation, the neutron undergoes neutron capture on an element in the detector, producing a delayed flash of 2.22 MeV if captured on a proton.[4] The timing of the delayed capture is 200–300 microseconds after IBD initiation (≈256 μs in the Borexino detector). The timing and spatial coincidence between the prompt positron annihilation and delayed neutron capture provides a clear IBD signature in neutrino detectors, allowing for discrimination from background.[4] The IBD cross section is dependent on antineutrino energy and capturing element, although is generally on the order of 10−44 cm2 (∼ attobarns).

The term “relativistic mass” tends not to be used in particle and nuclear physics and is often avoided by writers on special relativity, in favor of referring to the body’s relativistic energy.  In contrast, “invariant mass” is usually preferred over rest energy. The measurable inertia and the warping of spacetime by a body in a given frame of reference is determined by its relativistic mass, not merely its invariant mass. For example, photons have zero rest mass but contribute to the inertia (and weight in a gravitational field) of any system containing them.

νe + p → e++ n

Another kind of inverse beta decay is the reaction

νe + n → e− + p

The Homestake experiment used the reaction

Ve + 37Cl —>37Ar + e

To detect solar neutrinos Electron induced[edit] During the formation of neutron stars, or in radioactive isotopes capable of electron capture, neutrons are created by electron capture:

p+ e− → n + νe.

This is similar to the inverse beta reaction in that a proton is changed to a neutron, but is induced by the capture of an electron instead of an antineutrino.

“A geo-reactor with thermal power <30 TW and 235U : 238U =

0.76 : 0.23 composition was suggested by Herndon [36]. It is as-

sumed to be confined in the central part of the Earth’s core within

the radius of about 4 km [37]. We have produced MC spectra of the

  300 Borexino Collaboration / Physics Letters B 722 (2013) 295–300

Fig. 5. Q prompt light yield spectrum of the 46 prompt golden anti-neutrino candi-

dates and the best fit with free U (blue) and Th (cyan) contributions. The yellow

area isolates the total contribution of geo-  ̄νe s. Dashed red line/orange area: reactor-

 ̄νe signal from the fit. The contribution of background from Table 2 is almost negli-

gible and is shown by the small red filled area. The conversion from p.e. to energy

is approximately 500 p.e./MeV. (For interpretation of the references to color in this

figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this Letter.)

Fig. 6. The 68.27, 95.45, and 99.73% C.L. contour plots of the STh and SU signal rates

expressed in TNU units. The black point indicates the best fit values. The dashed

blue line represents the chondritic Th and U ratio.

expected geo-reactor anti-neutrino. In a similar unbinned maximal

likelihood fit of our 46 golden anti-neutrino candidates we have

added another fit component, Ngeo-react, while constraining Nreact

to the expected value of (33.3 ± 2.4) events. All other fit details

were as above, including fixed chondritic mass Th/U ratio. We set

the upper limit on the geo-reactor power 4.5 TW at 95%”

C.L Physics Letters B Volume 722, Issues 4–5, 24 May 2013, Pages 295-300

This equation describes how the Yukawa coupling changes with energy scale μ. Solutions to this equation for large initial values yt cause the right-hand side of the equation to quickly approach zero, locking yt to the QCD coupling g3.

The value of the top quark fixed point is fairly precisely determined in the Standard Model, leading to a top-quark mass of 220 GeV. This is about 25% larger than the observed top mass and may be hinting at new physics at higher energy scales.(1)(2)The quasi-infrared fixed point subsequently became the basis of top quark condensation theories of electroweak symmetry breaking, in which the Higgs boson is composite at extremely short distance scales, composed of a pair of top and antitop quarks. The predicted top-quark mass comes into improved agreement with the fixed point if there are additional Higgs scalars beyond the standard model and may be indicating that a rich spectroscopy of new Higgs fields lies at energy scales that can be probed with the LHC and its upgrades.(Wikipedia)(1)(2)

Hill, Christopher T.; Machado, Pedro; Thomsen, Anders; Turner, Jessica (2019). “Where are the next Higgs bosons?”. Physical Review D. 100 (1): 015051. arXiv:1904.04257. Bibcode:2019PhRvD.100a5051H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015051. S2CID 104291827.

Hill, Christopher T.; Machado, Pedro; Thomsen, Anders; Turner, Jessica (2019). “Where are the next Higgs bosons?”. Physical Review D. 100 (1): 015051. arXiv:1904.04257. Bibcode:2019PhRvD.100a5051H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015051. S2CID 104291827.

^ Hill, Christopher T.; Machado, Pedro; Thomsen, Anders; Turner, Jessica (2019). “Scalar democracy”. Physical Review D. 100 (1): 015015. arXiv:1902.07214. Bibcode:2019PhRvD.100a5015H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015015. S2CID 119193325.

Chapter 15

Chapter 16

ELEMENT 126, SCERRI-MADELUNG RULE, SUPERGRAVITY, SUPERHEAVIES, NEW NAMING PROTOCOLS

Accepting the idea that the atomic numbers of the periodic table can be advanced by 8 protons from the very middle of the table may make some heads spin, so I am including another visual from Wikipedia. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_periodic_table#Electron_configurations

Looking closely at the article you will see that the predicted unbihexium (element 126) has the closed proton shell of a noble gas and lies in the so-called “island of stability”.  If this looks familiar to you, 126 is the atomic number of my PTOE noble gas, Oganesson, (normally 118) e.g. 118 + 8 = 126. It is also predicted that element 126 is one of the “magic” number elements with a very long half-life. If these calculations, using the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartree%E2%80%93Fock_method are true, this is very good news for the advancement of science because it confirms the position of my element 126 as a noble gas and an element that can actually be isolated. Also, please note that the author of the Wikipedia article predicts that 126 may exist as a doubly magic isotope but continues on saying this may be anomalous stability, reflecting my idea about its unusual nuclear structure. (See fig 19) Here is what we should see if my above calculations are true:

In the block on the right above we see the perfect closed electron structure of 2,8,18,36,36,18,8 = 126 as expected. This will bring up an understandable objection from some: “… where did you get the extra 8 electrons in 36, 36?” Once again referring to Fig 6, you can see that the atomic numbers have advanced from 120 to 128 because of the new findings and there is no reason to believe that the electron shell structure would not follow by adding these 8 electrons in the appropriate shells. Looking back at my PTOE in figure 6 we see that the atomic number 118 is now occupied by the element Darmstadtium in the transition metal group directly above element 126. As it turns out, the relativistic effects on Og 118, may account for some of its solid metallic properties instead of the gaseous state of the noble group that it is supposed to belong to and closer to those of Darmstadtium. Once the 8 new elements are isolated a new naming sequence will have to be configured, perhaps one that includes both the new and the traditional names and states. Deciding between naming the new elements with their old names like Oganesson 126 or unbihexium 126, will present scientists with a whole new conundrum. We have already seen that element 126 ends in both closed proton and neutron shells so it would make sense that its electron shell structure would also close, which it does. However, as I noted previously, each of my new 7 periods of 18 elements each are closed by their respective noble gas thus theoretically originating a new rule that I am calling “The Scerri-Madelung” rule of n +, replacing the name of the old Madelung rule. This was done to acknowledge the fact that Dr. Eric Scerri has pushed for this completed, axiomized rule in so many of his articles and papers. https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_California_Los_Angeles Here is an excerpt from just one such article from The Foundations of Chemistry 2010 12:69–83:

It is important here that the reader heed Professor Scerri’s admonition above, “…it is not the closing of the shells that is chemically relevant but the closing of the periods”. If you look at my table in figure 6 you will see that each of my periods ends in a noble gas as required by Eric Scerri above. By the way, my table in Fig 6 solves the dispute of group-3 by including all 6 of the elements, Sc, Y, La, Lu, Ac, and Lr which should make people on both sides very happy. Also, imagine my surprise when I see that nuclear element synthesis is now heavily focused on the last 8 elements of my new periodic table. The new research is directed towards SHE, Superheavy Elements like 126 and those in particular in and around the island of stability noted above. There is some question lately whether superheavy 126 belongs in the category of magic numbers. This can be easily put to rest by the following formula which has only one conclusion:

Given N = 184, A = 310, x is a multiple of 18 (i.e. 18-108) and Z = At # of a noble gas, Then Z= A – (N + x)

The magic numbers 126, 184 and 310 parent the repopulation of every noble gas from 18 to 108 and this simple formula makes it happen. Here are two examples:

Element 108 = 310 – (184+18) and Argon 18 = 310 – (184+108).

The formula excludes elements 2 (Helium) and element 10 (Neon). Magic doesn’t get any better but there are some who do not think element 126 is magic, here is one such early 2001 article using a calculation method similar to the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method but comes to a different conclusion:

Shell Stabilization of Super- and Hyperheavy Nuclei Without Magic Gaps

M. Bender,1 W. Nazarewicz,2−4 P.–G. Reinhard5,6

1Gesellschaft f¨ur Schwerionenforschung, Planckstrasse 1, D–64291 Darmstadt, Germany 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 3Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 4Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, ul. Ho˙za 69, PL–00681, Warsaw, Poland

5Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik II, Universit¨at Erlangen-N¨urnberg, Staudtstrasse 7, D–91058 Erlangen, Germany 6Joint Institute for Heavy Ion Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P. O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 (March 23, 2001)

Quantum stabilization of superheavy elements is quantified in terms of the shell-correction energy. We compute the shell correction using self-consistent nuclear models: the non-relativistic Skyrme- Hartree-Fock approach and the relativistic mean-field model, for a number of parameterizations. All the forces applied predict a broad valley of shell stabilization around Z = 120 and N = 172-184.

“We also predict two broad regions of shell stabilization in hyperheavy elements with N _ 258 and N _ 308. Due to the large single-particle level density, shell corrections in the superheavy elements differ markedly from those in lighter nuclei. With increasing proton and neutron numbers, the regions of nuclei stabilized by shell effects become poorly localized in particle number, and the familiar pattern of shells separated by magic gaps is basically gone.”

 

Chapter 17

Putting it All Together

In order to give the reader a better idea of how this all comes together, I have made a cut-out section of the P.T.O.E. showing what these calculations mean for the future of the Periodic Table. I have limited my focus to those elements surrounding two Hopf fibrations at 72/73 and 108/109. The third fibration may be centered around element 126 and lead to the collapse of the field into a horn torus, thus repeating the whole field whether it is empty space or the middle of a neutron star. Take a look at my figure below starting with element 67 which leads into the first fibration at elements 72/73. It is at this point that a process called “simultaneous quadruple beta decay” begins:

If you look at the guide in the upper right corner you will see one of my most important findings, that the old original atomic mass has a matching isotope, 4 atomic numbers ahead. This Z+4 element, quadruple-beta process, is predicted by the addition of the first 4 missing elements at Z=72 and consists of the addition of 4 nucleons per element for each of the 32 elements until reaching element 102 where the Z+4 matches the element’s actual new atomic mass. Starting with element 106 there is no Z+4 mass and the actual mass matches the elements’ projected mass. This is where the next 4 of the 8 new elements are added and the equation becomes Z+8. (I will explain more about the quadruple beta process below) Anyone familiar with the writings of Dr. Ida Noddack can reasonably accept the concept of a four-element isotope skip when postulating our 8 missing elements. After her discovery of element 75, Rhenium, she wrote extensively about the use of isotopes in a new periodic system. This Nobel prize scientist wrote Her ideas about isotopes in the 1930s and now they are receiving a lot of attention as researchers approach the discovery of the super-heavy elements and their unusual isotopes.  To easily verify the +4 isotope rule, go to the amazing resource of the Ptable by Michael Dayah who has created the periodic table in so many useful iterations: https://ptable.com/#Isotopes His most recent version allows the user to mouse-over the element to see which isotopes are associated with it. I was shocked when all the isotopes for that element kept scrolling to the bottom of the page. You will not be able to find such a thorough listing anywhere on the web. What an incredible addition! Looking at the above section of my P.T.O.E., we can state a new +4 isotope rule as follows:

given Z = atomic number and A = mass number, if Z ≥ 72 & < 102, one isotope of that element    which is advanced to Z+4 thru quadruple beta transition has an A = to ± .5 A of that Z

The above formula applies only to my original periodic table shown in figure 3 and can be seen in the example above. This rule, in addition to my many other findings, confirms the probable existence of the 8 missing elements. This formula can’t be explained as either Alpha decay Z-2 or as Beta minus which is Z+1. This is not a decay chain but hot fusion nucleosynthesis. Beginning with rare earth element 70, the periodic table of elements is a natural, stellar, supernovae, and/or artificial build-up of one element to that of a heavier element. Decay chains are the opposite. In order for these 8 additional elements to have been created and virtually little trace of them left on the Earth, there must have been a very unusual cosmic event, one that could add 8 elements all at one event in time and all the way from 70 to element 128. This would seem to be impossible because of the Coulomb law barrier which limits the outcome but as strange as it seems, there may be a process to create the Z+4. The Triple-alpha process shows that it is possible, even though it applies to elements at the beginning of the table. Here is an excellent reference from Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple-alpha_process

Below is one way an element can gain +4 protons in the quadruple beta-plus decay:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_beta_decay#Higher_order_simultaneous_beta_decay  :

For mass numbers with more than two beta-stable isobars, quadruple beta decay and its inverse, quadruple electron capture, have been proposed as alternatives to double beta decay in the isobars with the greatest energy excess. These decays are energetically possible in eight nuclei, though partial half-lives compared to single or double beta decay are predicted to be very long; hence, quadruple beta decay is unlikely to be observed. The eight candidate nuclei for quadruple beta decay include ⁹⁶Zr, ¹³⁶Xe, and ¹⁵⁰Nd capable of quadruple beta-minus decay, and ¹²⁴Xe, ¹³⁰Ba, ¹⁴⁸Gd, and ¹⁵⁴Dy capable of quadruple beta-plus decay or electron capture. In theory, quadruple beta decay may be experimentally observable in three of these nuclei, with the most promising candidate being ¹⁵⁰Nd. Triple beta decay is also possible for ⁴⁸Ca, ⁹⁶Zr, and ¹⁵⁰Nd.^[32]

Moreover, such a decay mode could also be neutrinoless in physics beyond the standard model.^[33] Neutrinoless quadruple beta decay would violate lepton number in 4 units, as opposed to a lepton number breaking of two units in the case of neutrinoless double beta decay. Therefore, there is no ‘black-box theorem’ and neutrinos could be Dirac particles while allowing these type of processes. In particular, if neutrinoless quadruple beta decay is found before neutrinoless double beta decay then the expectation is that neutrinos will be Dirac particles.^[34]

Recently theoretical physicists have tied E8(8) Supergravity to the 256 points of Tony’s Cl (16)SU(8) configuration HyperCube. (See Appendix 2 below the E7(7) light cone)

The remaining paragraphs of this chapter are from ZPOWER 1999-2003, ZPower Corporation (ZPower), 5025 N Central #414, Phoenix AZ 85012 USA.

“This all-pervasive ZPE ‘sea’ also appears to maintain atomic structures throughout the cosmos. In 1987 an important paper was written on this matter.61 It explained that, according to classical physics, an electron in orbit around a proton should be radiating energy and so spiral into the nucleus. Obviously this does not happen, and physicists invoke quantum laws as an explanation. Nevertheless, an actual physical explanation is still desirable, and this was addressed by the paper in question. It assumed that classical physics was correct. The energy that electrons radiated as they orbited around their protons was calculated along with the energy that such electrons received from the all pervasive ZPE. It turns out that the two were identical.  In the Abstract, Hal Puthoff summarizes the results as follows: “the ground state of the hydrogen atom can be precisely defined as resulting from a dynamic equilibrium between radiation emitted due to acceleration of the electron in its ground state orbit and radiation absorbed from the zero-point fluctuations of the background vacuum electromagnetic field…”  In the same way that a child on a swing receives resonantly times pushes from an adult to keep the swing going, so also the electron received resonantly timed “pushes” from the ZPE. Puthoff elaborated on this explanation as follows: “The circular motion [of an electron in its orbit] can be thought of as two harmonic oscillator motions at right angles and 90 degrees out of phase, superimposed. These two oscillators are driven by the resonant components of the ZPE just as you would keep a kid swinging on a swing by resonantly-timed pushes. The oscillator motion acts as a filter to select out the energy at the right frequency (around 450 angstroms wavelength for the hydrogen atom Bohr orbit ground state).” 62 Energy is therefore transferred from the Zero Point Fields (ZPF) to maintain electrons in their atomic orbits by this resonance mechanism.”

“Einstein’s general theory of relativity is based on the assumption that inertial and gravitational mass are equivalent and indistinguishable-the socalled principle of equivalence. Hence it stands to reason that if the ZPF gives rise to the phenomenon of inertia, it must also in some way generate the effect of gravity. This audacious idea was proposed as early as 1968 by the Russian physicist and dissident Andrei D. Sakharov, but he never fully developed the concept into a scientific theory.”

“In 1989 the idea was taken up by one of us (Puthoff) and formulated within the framework of stochastic electrodynamics into a preliminary but quantifiable, nonrelativistic representation of Newtonian gravitation. The underlying principle is remarkably intuitive. If a charged particle is subjected to ZPF interactions, it will be forced to fluctuate in response to the random jostlings of the ZPOWER CORPORATION PAGE 194 OF 352 ZERO POINT ENERGY electromagnetic waves of the ZPF. Moreover, since the ZPF is all-pervasive, charged particles everywhere in the universe will be forced to fluctuate. Now a basic result from classical electrodynamics is that a fluctuating electric charge emits an electromagnetic radiation field. The result is that all charges in the universe will emit secondary electromagnetic fields in response to their interactions with the primary field, the ZPF. The secondary electromagnetic fields turn out to have a remarkable property. Between any two particles they give rise to an attractive force. The force is much weaker than the ordinary attractive or repulsive forces between two stationary electric charges, and it is always attractive, whether the charges are positive or negative. The result is that the secondary fields give rise to an attractive force we propose may be identified with gravity. It is important to note that the fluctuations are relativistic-that is, the charges move at velocities at or close to the speed of light. The energy associated with the fluctuations-which for historical reasons is given the German name zitterbewegung, or trembling movement-is interpreted as the energy equivalent of gravitational rest mass. Since the gravitational force is caused by the trembling motion, there is no need to speak any longer of a gravitational mass as the source of gravitation. The source of gravitation is the driven motion of a charge, not the attractive power of the thing physicists are used to thinking of as mass. To interpret Einstein’s equation E=mc2, we would say that mass is not equivalent to energy. Mass is energy.”

Chapter 18

NAMING THE 8 MISSING ELEMENTS

I am sure there is an international commission on naming elements where men of prestigious credentials sit down and agree on what names to assign to which elements and that is probably a good thing. From the early days of its history, the periodic table has been assigned a variety of element names that were left in the dust of advancing science. Names like Virginium, Alabamine, Nipponium, Keltium, Columbium, Cassiopium, and Niton just to name a few. I believe that the best of the naming sequences have been to name the prominent scientist who actually contributed to the advancement of Physics and/or Chemistry. Einsteinium or Es is just one such name. I of course have my own wish list of names, so here goes: New element 70 – An – Astonium (after F.W. Aston), new element 71 or Jt – Janetium (after Charles Janet), new element 72 – Keltium or Kt (Hafnium’s original name), new element 73– Mazurium or Mz (after Edward G. Mazurs), new element 106 – Heisenbergium or Hm (after Werner Heisenberg), new element 107 – Thomsonium or To (after J.J. Thomson), new element 108 – Asimovium or Av (after Isaac Asimov) and lastly, new element 109 – Hahnium or Ha (after Otto Hahn).

The above list of scientists are among my favorites, my heroes if you will.  These scientists have added to or enriched my journey leading to the discovery of the Periodic Table of Everything.  The new table is complete because of their work in the field of chemistry or physics.  I believe naming the 8 missing elements must lead everyone to the same sense of wonder and awe that lead to their discovery.  I would like to take the reader along the path of awe and wonder while we name each of these elements. This may be a fruitless journey for both of us because neither of us has a say over the naming process.

Starting with the new element 70, we will call it,  Astonium, Symbol An.

Chapter 19

THE EXPANDING EARTH

As for my original question about the expanding earth theory of my father, there is no doubt that Earth expansion has occurred and it is still in the process. All one has to do is type the words, “Expanding Earth Theory”, and thousands of references will follow. I have also included many of those in appendix #2. Here is just one:

Wen-Bin Shen, Rong Sun, Wei Chen, Zhenguo Zhang, Jin Li, Jiancheng Han, Hao Ding

The expanding Earth at present: evidence from temporal gravity field and space-geodetic data

https://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4951 

The Earth expansion problem has attracted great interest, and the present study demonstrates that the Earth has been expanding, at least over the recent several decades. Space-geodetic data recorded at stations distributed globally were used (including global positioning system data, very-long-baseline interferometry, satellite laser ranging stations, and stations for Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite), which covered a period of more than 10 years in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2008. A triangular network covering the surface of the Earth was thus constructed based on the spherical Delaunay approach, and average-weighted vertical variations in the Earth surface were estimated. Calculations show that the Earth is expanding at present at a rate of 0.24 ± 0.04 mm/yr. Furthermore, based on the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 and the secular variation rates of the second-degree coefficients estimated by satellite laser ranging and Earth mean-pole data, the principal inertia moments of the Earth (A, B, C) and in particular their temporal variations, were determined: the simple mean value of the three principal inertia moments (i.e., [A+B+C]/3) is gradually increasing. This clearly demonstrates that the Earth has been expanding, at least over the recent decades, and the data show that the Earth is expanding at a rate ranging from 0.17 ± 0.02 mm/yr to 0.21 ± 0.02 mm/yr, which coincides with the space geodetic evidence. Hence, based on both space geodetic observations and gravimetric data, we conclude that the Earth has been expanding at a rate of about 0.2 mm/yr over recent decades.

any earth scientists now believe that there is an active fission process occurring in and around Earth’s core that could be driving the expansion. (See Figure 25)

Deep-Earth reactor: Nuclear fission, helium, and the geomagnetic field

D. F. Hollenbach and J. M. Herndon

PNAS September 25, 2001 98 (20) 11085-11090; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201393998

Geomagnetic field reversals and changes in intensity are understandable from an energy standpoint as natural consequences of intermittent and/or variable nuclear fission chain reactions deep within the Earth. Moreover, deep-Earth production of helium, having 3He/4He ratios within the range observed from deep-mantle sources, is demonstrated to be a consequence of nuclear fission. Numerical simulations of a planetary-scale geo-reactor were made by using the SCALE sequence of codes. The results clearly demonstrate that such a geo-reactor (i) would function as a fast-neutron fuel breeder reactor; (ii) could, under appropriate conditions, operate over the entire period of geologic time; and (iii) would function in such a manner as to yield variable and/or intermittent output power.

“Further evidence of the georeactor comes from Hawaii and Iceland”, Hollenbach said, “where young lava basalts have been recovered that contain the helium isotopes He3 and He4. While He4 is a byproduct of the decay of natural uranium, He3 can only be produced deep within the Earth in a nuclear reaction.”

Herndon’s latest paper went even further, suggesting that the ratios of He3 to He4 indicated that the geo-reactor is reaching the end of its life — albeit in perhaps a billion years. Hollenbach said he disagrees with that conclusion. This research was performed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed and operated by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC05–00OR22725.

Before you dismiss the above as fake science, you should know about the Oklo natural fission site. “Oklo, Gabon, Africa is the only known location for this in the world and consists of 16 sites at which self-sustaining nuclear fission reactions are thought to have taken place approximately 1.7 billion years ago, and ran for a few hundred thousand years, averaging probably less than 100 kW of thermal power during that time.” (Wikipedia) Further research into J.M. Herndon’s papers/web pages reveal that he thinks there is an Actinoid and Lathanoid flux around the nuclear core feeding the nuclear reactor process. Because of its relevance to my theory of mass creation via the Higgs portal phenomena at the beginning and end of both of these rare earth element periods, I predict that an entirely different dark matter/dark energy process is taking place in the core. From one scientist I have the following quote, “Assuming a connection between Earth expansion and capture of dark matter in the Earth’s core, we have two possibilities for a conversion mechanism. First, dark matter directly reacts with Earth’s matter. Second, Earth matter only catalyzes the change of dark matter into visible matter.” I like the latter explanation because it agrees with the idea of a Higgs mechanism and/or a black hole.

Before you dismiss the above as fake science, you should know about the Oklo natural fission site. “Oklo, Gabon, Africa is the only known location for this in the world and consists of 16 sites at which self-sustaining nuclear fission reactions are thought to have taken place approximately 1.7 billion years ago, and ran for a few hundred thousand years, averaging probably less than 100 kW of thermal power during that time.” (Wikipedia)

But there is much more.  Here is a recent work using neutrino detectors to find out if the Earth has a miniature sun in its core.

“The Earth releases radiogenic heat, Hgeo, together with geo-neutrinos in a well fixed ratio, however the observed geo-neutrino signal depends both on the abundances of the individual radioactive elements and on their distribution inside the Earth. To extract the radiogenic heat power from a measured Sgeo is therefore model dependent. We have calculated the expected Sgeo(U Th) as a function of the radiogenic heat produced by U and Th, Hgeo(U Th), for the Borexino and KamLAND sites (see Fig. 4), and compared it to the Borexino and KamLAND [4] results. The allowed regions between the red and blue lines in the plane Sgeo(U Th) and Hgeo(U Th) contain models consistent with geochemical and geophysical data. For each total mass of U and fixed Th/U ratio, the maximal geo-neutrino signal (red line) can be obtained by maxi- mizing the radiogenic material in the crust and allowing uniform distribution in the mantle. Similarly, the minimal signal (blue line)

is obtained for the minimal radiogenic mass in the crust with the rest concentrated in a thin layer at the bottom of the mantle. The expected signal from the crust is taken from Table V of [6]. We have chosen as a reference the BSE model from [29], predicting that the silicate Earth contains m(U) (0.8 0.1) 1017 kg with mass ratios Th/U 3.9 and K/U 12 000. The green regions are allowed by the BSE model [29]. The arrow “Min” indicates the

contribution of the crust only. The arrow for the fully radiogenic model indicates 39.3 TW: it assumes that the total Earth surface heat flux of (47.2) TW [38] is completely due to radiogenic heat from U, Th, and K. Taking the relative proportions from the BSE of [29], we get that in a fully radiogenic Earth, U, Th, and K pro- duce 19.1, 20.2, and 7.7 TW, respectively.

We have performed another unbinned maximal likelihood fit of our 46 golden candidates in which the individual contributions from the 238U and 232Th chains were fitted individually (see Fig. 5), with all other fit details as above. The best fit values are NTh (3.9 4.7) events and NU (9.8  7.2) events, correspond- ing to STh   (10.6   12.7) TNU and SU  (26.5   19.5) TNU andνe  fluxes (above 0 MeV) of φ(Th)   (2.6   3.1)   106 cm−2 s−1

and  φ(U)   (2.1    1.5)   106  cm−2 s−1 .  The  68.27,  95.45, and

99.73% C.L. contour plots of STh versus SU are shown in Fig. 6. Although our data is compatible within 1σ with only 238U signal (and STh 0) or only 232Th signal (and SU 0), we note that the best fit of the Th/U ratio is in very good agreement with the chondritic value.

A geo-reactor with thermal power <30 TW and 235U : 238U 0.76 : 0.23 composition was suggested by Herndon [36]. It is assumed to be confined in the central part of the Earth’s core within the radius of about 4 km [37]. We have produced MC spectra of the

expected geo-reactor anti-neutrino. In a similar unbinned maximal likelihood fit of our 46 golden anti-neutrino candidates we have added another fit component, Ngeo-react , while constraining Nreact to the expected value of (33.3 2.4) events. All other fit details were as above, including fixed chondritic mass Th/U ratio. We set the upper limit on the geo-reactor power 4.5 TW at 95% C.L.”

Further research into J.M. Herndon’s papers/web pages reveal that he thinks there is an Actinoid and Lathanoid flux around the nuclear core feeding the nuclear reactor process. Because of its relevance to my theory of mass creation via the Higgs portal phenomena at the beginning and end of both of these rare earth element periods, I predict that an entirely different dark matter/dark energy process is taking place in the core. From one scientist I have the following quote, “Assuming a connection between Earth expansion and capture of dark matter in the Earth’s core, we have two possibilities for a conversion mechanism. First, dark matter directly reacts with Earth’s matter. Second, Earth matter only catalyzes the change of darkmatterintovisiblematter.”

I like the latter explanation because it agrees with the idea of a Higgs mechanism and/ or a black hole.

Here is another such expanding Earth article:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984718301678

A PDF article about deep mantle plumes and the expanding earth.

Here is another such expanding Earth article:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984718301678 A PDF article about deep mantle plumes and the expanding earth.

Here is a book describing the consequences of the Dirac equation of gravity on the expanding earth. “The Expanding Earth: Some Consequences of Dirac’s Gravitation Hypothesis”

By Pascual Jordan”

Below is another good article by H Kragh discussing some of the most brilliant minds in mathematics and physics adding their input as to the expanding Earth. Expanding Earth and declining gravity: a chapter in the recent history of geophysics, Kragh,Niels Bohr Archive, Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark —-Correspondence to: H. Kragh (helge.kragh@nbi.ku.dk) Received: 4 February 2015 – Accepted: 16 April 2015 –Published: 5 May 2015

Here is just one section of this excellent source:

Claiming that there was “a considerable body of evidence” supporting a decreasing G, Hoyle considered the effects on the motion of the Moon, solar luminosity, the temperature of Earth in the past,  and the motion of the continents. All of these subjects had been covered in detail previously, but now Hoyle reconsidered them from the point of view of the Hoyle–Narlikar gravitation theory (Hoyle, 1972). For the rate of increase of Earth’s radius, he calculated a value between 6 and 10 km per 108 years (0.1mmyr1), suggesting that the expansion combined with mantle convection explained how the continental plates were set in horizontal motion. Hoyle’s somewhat amateurish excursion into geophysics made even less of an impact than Jordan’s longer and more serious excursion. Hugh Owen, a paleontologist, and cartographer at the British Museum was among the few who found Hoyle’s theory promising. A late advocate of the expanding Earth, he suggested that Earth’s diameter was approximately half its current value 700 million years ago (Owen,1976, 1984; Fig. 4). Hoyle’s old friend and collaborator, the Cambridge astronomer,      Raymond Lyttleton,   did not believe in continental drift. In a critical reply to the Hoyle–Narlikar hypothesis, he and his collaborator John Finch recalculated the change of Earth’s radius on the assumption of G1=t and Ramsay’s hypothesis of the inner Earth.  They found a rate of change in radius of dR=dt D 2.3 km per 108 yr, or less than a quarter of the value reported by Hoyle and Narlikar. “It is clearly impossible,” they concluded, “that a decreasing G could alone cause expansion on such a scale that a fissure between Africa and South America would span some 5000 km in width” (Lyttleton and Finch, 1977). Hist. Geo Space Sci., 6, 45–55, 2015 www.hist-geo-space-sci.net/6/45/2015/ doi:10.5194/hgss-6-45-2015

© Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License

ANOTHER FINE ARTICLE:

In a recent article in this journal, Paolo Sudiro (2014) considered the long history of the expanding Earth theory and its recent descent into what he termed “pseudoscientific belief”. The expanding Earth theory contends that the radius of the Earth was once one-half to two-thirds of its current value, with the Earth’s continents forming a continuous sialic cover over the Earth. The theory has had two main variants: slow expansion at about 0.5 mm yr−1 radial increase since the time of Earth’s formation and fast expansion at about 5 mm yr−1 since the Triassic. Focusing on Maxlow’s model, Sudiro thoroughly addresses the possibly insurmountable difficulties of the fast version, such as an improbably high density and surface gravity prior to 200 Ma. He omits, however, any discussion of the slow expansion model, which has a longer history and far fewer theoretical difficulties. Moreover, recent evidence from space geodesy, gravimetry, and seismology indicates that the Earth at present may be slowly expanding at 0.1–0.4 mm yr−1. It is concluded that Sudiro’s obituary of the expanding Earth theory as a whole must be considered premature at this time.

Edwards, M. R.: Indications from space geodesy, gravimetry, and seismology for slow Earth expansion at present – comment on “The Earth expansion theory and its transition from scientific hypothesis to pseudoscientific belief” by Sudiro (2014), Hist. Geo Space. Sci., 7, 125–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hgss-7-125-2016, 2016.

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Also, look for references to the expanding earth theory in the appendix 2 below. Whatever the cause, there is firm evidence that Earth expansion is an ongoing phenomenon.

Chapter 20

My Closing Thoughts

I have proposed several theses in this paper. Firstly, I suggest that the PTOE is a periodic table in which there are more than 42 perfect triads showing that this table is in a primal reduced form on which known principles and rules are based, the triad principle being just one. Secondly, the above primal form shows a perfect sequence of circular rotational degrees in the vertical column of the noble gases that describes the advancement of spin angles from 0° to 1260° thus directly connecting it to the quantum nuclear physics of spin and the QFT itself. Thirdly, and most significant, I have made a reasoned argument backed by scientific references that there are 8 missing heavy rare earth elements. The form of the new table based on the Lie algebra of E(7) shows that these spaces actually exist and that the elements represented can be shown to have a residual bare mass based on the Higgs mechanism. (proof awaits further experiments at the LHC)

I started this study some 50 years ago, expecting to find a reasonable answer to the question about how the Earth’s radius could have increased to over ⅔ its original size. I had no idea it would lead me to one of the biggest mistakes in science, namely the placement of the rare earth elements below Mendeleev’s original periodic table of the elements. I have attempted to show that when this occurred it was done to hide a puzzle that could only be solved with time. It was most certainly an innocent “white lie” but had consequences for the advancement of science and therefore humanity. If scientists had been focused on the 8 missing elements they could have been lead to the same conclusions that I have reached.

Just from the simple view of the chemistry model many new compounds, pharmaceuticals and free energy could have saved lives and made advances in global warming.

I have shown examples of more than four prominent scientists, all of them outstanding in their field of chemistry, who knew that the 8 elements remained unaccounted for but could not change the course of history. Charles Janet made a discovery that would almost certainly explain many aspects of the Periodic Table’s form and function but without the power to disseminate it. I am coincidently the same age as Janet when he published his last work and the same age as Frank (Tony) Smith when his finished his life’s work. I am happy to admit that I stand on the shoulders of these six giants and the many others I have referenced here.

After years of searching, I stumbled across the last few pieces of evidence that I needed. The works of Ida Noddack who was nominated for the Nobel prize for her discovery of one of the last heavy elements, Rhenium, encouraged me to continue. Dr. Eric Scerri is another important figure that influenced me greatly. His openness to discovery and his philosophy of chemistry let me know that some questions have yet to been explained. His books are a deep dive into the structure, history, and philosophy of the periodic table of the elements. His communications let me know which of his many books could help me in my journey of discovery and I want to personally thank him for that. When I discovered Isaac Asimov’s book on “The Physical Sciences” first published in 1960, I turned to his page on the periodic table, and there it was, the same 8 missing element spaces. It was the work of all the above scientists including the great Dmitri Mendeleev with whose tables I began my journey that encouraged me to continue on. I stopped many times over the years in discouragement but just then, another great figure from history appeared. It was only after I found the monumental work of Garret Lisi on the exceptional Lie algebra of E8 that my final search became a reality. I then found the work of Frank (Tony) Smith who had devoted a lifetime to the Lie algebras and the Quantum Field Theory. His amazing insights into the physics behind E8 and the Clifford algebras made my task very easy. It was at this point that I saw the congruence of the 128 vertices of E7 and the 128 chemical elements of my table. What still remained a mystery was the quantum physics of the 8 missing elements, two of which are noble gases. When I saw the amazing parallel between the inert noble gas atomic numbers along the vertical length of the table and their correspondence with the spin integer degrees i.e. 18-180°, 36-360°, 54-540°, and 72-720°, I knew then that I could solve the mystery. Critical to this discovery was my fiddling around with a particularly long table that I was comparing to the twists of the DNA molecule, e.g. Hopf fibration twists of S7. I could not understand why it took so many twists to get back to the beginning of my completed table. This insight was explained when I saw the Feynberg, Dirac memorial lectures, explaining the reality of spin orientation, concluding his remarks by saying, “Fermions are quaternionic”. This statement helped to propel me forward with the PTOE.

Chapter 21

Discovery of Element 126

What about the discovery of element 126?  When I was young my father built a Geiger counter for the discovery of radioactive uranium deposits which he was convinced lay beneath the rocky soil of the Ozark mountains.  I grew up familiar with how it worked and went on “expeditions” with him.  The clicking of the counter fascinated me.  As chance would have it, my career brought me to an area of the U.S. that was extensively strip-mined for rare earth minerals with some of them remaining on the surface. These scars in the earth became mostly smaller and some larger lakes but much of the material remains on the surface along a 20×3 mile path from north to south.  This area extends through most of the southside of our city, where I happen to live, and where we have one of the highest rates of lung cancer in the nation.  My research into radioactive rare earth elements led me to a remote article on a method for isolating a slightly radioactive rare-earth, element 126.  Most chemists or physicists reading this paper can probably guess how it could be done by looking at the structure of my PTOE.  This will be the subject of a new book.

Bibliography

A Bibliography:  Important books, references, and links either cited or referenced in my work

“The Chemical Elements”, Helen Miles Davis 1952

“Physics and Chemistry of the Earth”, Ida Noddack, 1920

“The Building Blocks of the Universe”, Issac Asimov, 1960

“The Elements”, Jerome Myer, 1957

“The Abundance of the Elements”, Lawrence Aller, 2015

“A Tale of Oblivion:  Ida Noddack and the Universal Abundance of Matter,

Gildo Santos, Sept 2014, The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science

“The Periodic Table, its Story and its Significance”, Eric Scerri, 2006

“A Scientific Autobiography”, Otto Hahn, 1966

“The Birth of the Earth”, David E. Fisher, 1987

“Flash of Genius”, Alfred A. Garrett, 2012

“Isotopes”, F.W. Aston, London 1922, Edward Arnold and Co.

“The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon” Dr. Paul K Kuroda, 1982

“The Development of the Periodic Law”, F.P. Preston, 1983

“A New Diagram of the Periodic Table”, R.M. Deeley, 1893

“A tabular Expression of the Periodic Relations of the Elements”, Henry Bassett, 1892

“Graphic Representation of the Periodic System during 100 years”, Edward G. Mazurs, 1974

“The Expanding Earth”, Everett J. Tasset, 1982, SW Missouri University, Archived Books Section

“The helicoidal classification of the elements”, Charles Janet, 1929, Chemical News.

APPENDIX (1):

Here are the physics calculations from Frank (Tony) Smith that I have partially used in reference to my PTOE theory. I apologize for including many of his papers (in the form of PDF’s) that were not dated. His below statement of S7-Spin(8) is only where the story begins when he discovers that the S7(7) can be seen as a Clifford Algebra. The twisted fibrations are Hopf :

Below is a link to Frank (Tony) Smith’s physics and algebraic calculations.  Some of the pages are quite involved.  If you want a more detailed look and summary from his over 40 years of work, let me know and I will send you more links and/or pages.

http://www.tony5m17h.net/E8GLTSCl8xtnd.html#calc

 

Below is another excellent article by H Kragh discussing some of the most brilliant minds in mathematics and physics adding their input as to the expanding Earth. Expanding Earth and declining gravity: a chapter in the recent history of geophysics

H. Kragh

Niels Bohr Archive, Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Correspondence to: H. Kragh (helge.kragh@nbi.ku.dk)

Received: 4 February 2015 – Accepted: 16 April 2015 – Published: 5 May 2015

Here is just one section of this excellent source:

Claiming that there was “a considerable body of evidence” supporting a decreasing G, Hoyle considered the effects on the motion of the Moon, solar luminosity, the temperature of Earth in the past, and the motion of the continents. All of these subjects had been covered in detail previously, but now Hoyle reconsidered them from the point of view of the Hoyle–Narlikar gravitation theory (Hoyle, 1972). For the rate of increase of Earth’s radius, he calculated a value between 6 and 10 km per 108 years (0.1mmyr1), suggesting that the expansion combined with mantle convection explained how the continental plates were set in horizontal motion. Hoyle’s somewhat amateurish excursion into geophysics made even less of an impact than Jordan’s longer and more serious excursion. Hugh Owen, a paleontologist, and cartographer at the British Museum was among the few who found Hoyle’s theory promising. A late advocate of the expandingEarth, he suggested that Earth’s diameter was approximately half its current value 700 million years ago (Owen,1976, 1984; Fig. 4). Hoyle’s old friend and collaborator, the Cambridge astronomer Raymond Lyttleton, did not believe in continental drift. In a critical reply to the Hoyle–Narlikar hypothesis, he and his collaborator John Finch recalculated the change of Earth’s radius on the assumption of G1=t and Ramsay’s hypothesis of the inner Earth. They found a rate of change in radius of dR=dt D 2.3 km per 108 yr, or less than a quarter of the value reported by Hoyle and Narlikar. “It is clearly impossible,” they concluded, “that a decreasing G could alone cause expansion on such a scale that a fissure between Africa and South America would span some 5000 km in width” (Lyttleton and Finch, 1977).

Hist. Geo Space Sci., 6, 45–55, 2015 www.hist-geo-space-sci.net/6/45/2015/ doi:10.5194/hgss-6-45-2015

© Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

SIGNIFICANT WEB LINKS

http://www.tony5m17h.net/d4d5e6hist.html (Tony)

http://www.tony5m17h.net/TShome.html (Tony)

http://www.tony5m17h.net/E8GLTSCl8xtnd.html (Tony’s E-8)

http://www.valdostamuseum.com/hamsmith/Sets2Quarks4.html#ultraVfinite (Tony) ) http://www.tony5m17h.net/GLe8Cl8.html (Tony) http://valdostamuseum.com/hamsmith/NDalg.html#purespinor (Tony) http://valdostamuseum.com/hamsmith/clfpq.html#SPIN

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.463.1882&rep=rep1&type=pdf (John Frederick Sweeney) http://theoryofeverything.org/TOE/JGM/Integrated%20E8,%20Binary,%20Octonion-web.pdf

http://theoryofeverything.org/theToE/2015/03/23/e8-particle-assignment-triality-symmetries/ (Moxness) http://theoryofeverything.org/TOE/JGM/Fano.pdf (Moxness)

https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=589 (chemogenisis) http://theoryofeverything.org/theToE/2013/04/26/created-a-new-4d-stowe-janet-scerri-periodic-table/ (Moxness) http://theoryofeverything.org/TOE/JGM/ToE_Demonstration.cdf (Moxness) https://fgmarcelis.wordpress.com/witting-polytope/ (Marcelis polytopes)

http://theoryofeverything.org/TOE/JGM/Integrated%20E8,%20Binary,%20Octonion-web.pdf (Moxness, Scerri example)

https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=1076 (Asimov table) https://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/35_pt/pt_database.php?PT_id=1126 (my table)

http://theoryofeverything.org/theToE/2015/03/23/e8-particle-assignment-triality-symmetries/ (particle assignment 256)

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Spin%287%29%2FG2+is+the+7-sphere https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/7-sphere https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/exotic+7-sphere https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Hopf+construction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven-dimensional_space https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7-cube

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinor https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_annihilation_operators https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_quantum_number

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_periodic_table#Electron_configurations see Unbipentium  see magic numbers of nucleons https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_rotation_group SO3

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin%E2%80%93statistics_theorem Gauge ghosts are spinless fermions, but they include states of negative norm. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics)

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eric_Scerri/publication/225802509_Explaining_the_periodic_table_and_the_role_of_chemical_triads/links/00b7d5230770c7ff3c000000.pdf Dr Scerri explains triads

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foYIHXkHH5w&t=701s (A Tony Smith video recording explaining everything, poor quality)

https://youtu.be/LzpbDttfh9g (animated rotation of the E(8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAIw123DIcI (Garrett Lisi explains his particle explorer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK0qkkjimfo (Garrett Lisi explains the Higgs Boson) https://edu.rsc.org/feature/the-trouble-with-the-aufbau-principle/2000133.article (Problems with the Aufbau) https://phys.org/news/2016-06-knowns-unknowns-dark.html (great explanation of dark matter)

https://web.archive.org/web/20060313032546/http://www.chemcases.com/cisplat/cisplat06.htm (explanation of the Lanthanide contraction) https://www.dinox.org/sugbooks.html (list of expanding earth books)

http://nuclearplanet.com/Herndon’s%20Nuclear%20Georeactor.html (Herndon’s georeactor) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray_spallation#/media/File:Nucleosynthesis_periodic_table.svg (explanation of Nucleosunthesis) http://www.horntorus.com/illustration/unrolling_line_1to2.html (horn torus animation)

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-the-higgs-field-2699354 (explanation of the Higgs field) https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-quantum-gravity-2699360 (the graviton) https://arxiv.org/pdf/0803.2398v1.pdf (Lorentz invariance violation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator#Example:_3D_isotropic_harmonic_oscillator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_nuclides#Tables (Table of Nuclides) https://phys.org/news/2017-03-portal-unveil-dark-sector-universe.html (Axion portal) https://mathworld.wolfram.com/StarofDavidTheorem.html (Star of David theory) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjoint_representation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_particles

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270394417_The_expanding_Earth_a_sound_idea_for_the_new_millennium (Scalera expanding earth) http://www.eearthk.com/ (extensive database on the expanding earth)

https://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0408/0408539.pdf extensive J. Marvin Herndon’s earth theory) https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1903/1903.12574.pdf Iron slurry in core) https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.11837.pdf (Eigenmodes in liquid cores) http://nuclearplanet.com/pnas%202003.pdf Herndon’s helium eveidence) https://www.nature.com/articles/srep37740 (link to earth core fusion PDF)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984715000518 (Geodetic measurement of expanding earth) https://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4951 (Expanding earth) https://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/3057/3100 (changing radius cartography) http://www.frontier-knowledge.com/earth/ (Bill Erickson’s web)

http://www.jamesmaxlow.com/ (Dr. James Maxlow’s expanding earth) https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/JonesSEgeofusiona.pdf (Geo-fusion) https://www.dinox.org/comparept-et.html (Paleographic globes)